PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Animal Science0 citations

Impact of the Frequency of Varying Modified Distillers Grains Plus Solubles Inclusions in Feedlot Diets on Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Feeding Behavior, and Ruminal pH of Finishing Steers

View Full Paper
PMPaige MadisonSSSofia Suarez-LorencesJBJosh R Benton

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the effect of varying the frequency of modified distillers grains inclusions on cattle performance, health, and behavior.
  • Steers (n=229) were blocked by body weight into pens and assigned to different diets involving MDGS variations.
  • Data on dry matter intake, feeding behavior, and ruminal pH were collected over 131 days during finishing.
  • Statistical analysis used the MIXED procedure of SAS, with significance set at P ≤ 0.10.
  • Cattle fed constant MDGS had higher average daily gain (ADG; P ≤ 0.02) compared to those on weekly variations.
  • Hot carcass weights (HCW) for MDGS treatments ranged from 420 to 426 kg, with the control at 412 kg.
  • Incidence of liver abscesses was lower in MDGS treatments compared to the corn control (P = 0.07).

Abstract

Abstract Inconsistencies in distillers grains deliveries have complicated cattle feeding for feedlot producers and have required diet adjustments during the feeding period. The objective of this study was to determine how the frequency of changing inclusions of modified distillers grains plus solubles (MDGS) throughout the feeding period impacts feedlot cattle performance, carcass characteristics, feeding behavior, and ruminal pH. Steers (n = 229; initial BW = 426 ± 22 kg) were blocked by body weight into one of eight pens, each equipped with five electronic feed bunks (RIC2Discover system; Hokofarm). Treatments for this study included 1) a corn control, 2) 25% MDGS kept at a constant inclusion, and 25% MDGS varying from 15 to 35% on a 3) daily, 4) weekly, or 5) monthly basis. Individual animal dry matter intake (DMI) and feeding behavior data were collected for 131 days during the finishing period. Ruminal pH was evaluated on a subset of steers in one pen (n = 16) for the control, constant, and daily treatments. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, with treatment and block as fixed effects. Significance was set at P ≤ 0.10. The inclusion of MDGS improved average daily gain (ADG; P ≤ 0.02) and hot carcass weight (HCW; P ≤ 0.06) compared to the control. Cattle fed MDGS constantly had greater ADG compared to weekly variation in MDGS. The HCW for control, constant, daily, weekly, and monthly were 412, 426, 422, 419 and 420 kg, respectively. There was no difference between treatments for DMI (P = 0.42). Cattle fed the control had the lowest G:F and cattle fed constant MDGS had the greatest G:F (P ≤ 0.05), with cattle fed the variable treatments being intermediate. There were no differences between treatments for carcass characteristics (P ≥ 0.12). Dietary treatment impacted the incidence of liver abscesses (P = 0.07), with cattle fed the corn control having the greatest and cattle fed any of the MDGS treatments having lower incidences. For feeding behavior, there were no differences between treatments in number of bunk visits or time spent at the bunk each day (P ≥ 0.19). The day-to-day variation in DMI differed between treatments (P = 0.02), with the control and daily cattle having the highest variation in DMI across days. For the control, constant and daily treatments ruminal pH was 5.87, 6.10 and 6.08, respectively, with the corn control having the lowest pH (P 0.07) compared to constant and daily. Results suggest that varying MDGS had little impact on cattle performance and feeding behavior, and varying weekly had the largest impact on feedlot cattle when compared to daily or monthly variation. However, including MDGS in the diet was beneficial to just feeding corn.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Madison et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecfe9b9154b0b82876e6chttps://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag107.264
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper