PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Policy-led Crop Size Regulation and ICT-Enabled Marketing Ecosystem in FCV Tobacco to Ensure Price Stability

View Full Paper
KRK. Viswantha ReddyMMM. Shashi MadhavLPL.K. Prasad

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of crop size fixation and ICT-enabled e-auction system on price stability in FCV tobacco.
  • Assess effectiveness of Crop Size Fixation Policy and IT-enabled e-auction system
  • Analyze secondary time-series data using graphical analysis and instability index
  • Compare price instability from 2002-2013 to 2012-2023 periods in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka
  • Price instability reduced from 40% to 13% in Andhra Pradesh and from 38% to 8% in Karnataka post-e-auction
  • Average prices increased significantly from Rs 65/kg to Rs 125/kg in Andhra Pradesh and Rs 70/kg to Rs 127/kg in Karnataka
  • Insignificant difference of 0.7 M kg in Andhra Pradesh and 2.9 M kg in Karnataka between average crop size fixed and actual production realized

Abstract

Tobacco, a commercial crop, valued for its high returns, provides livelihood to ~ 45 million population and income and contributes to export earnings (Rs 12006 Crores in 2023-24). Recently, commercial crops like tomato, chilli, and onion observed a high imbalance in demand and supply and a high price volatility, which created a crisis-like situation in India. Conversely, FCV tobacco farming, regulated by policy-led crop size fixation, is more vibrant, and operates in an organized environment. In this context, a study has assessed the effectiveness of the Crop Size Fixation Policy and Information Technology (IT)-enabled e-auction system in FCV tobacco. The graphical analysis and instability index were employed by using secondary time-series data. The results found that the difference between the average crop size fixed (143.5 M kg) and average actual production realized (142.2 M kg) was very insignificant (0.7 M kg), in Andhra Pradesh during the last decade while in Karnataka, there was a slight difference (2.9 M kg) between the average of crop size fixed (99.1 M kg) and average actual production realized (96.2 M kg) in the corresponding period. The price instability has significantly decreased from 40% to 13% in Andhra Pradesh and 38% to 8% in Karnataka during the manual action period (2002-2013) compared to the e-auctioning period (2012-2023) and the average prices have increased from Rs 65/kg to Rs 125/kg in Andhra Pradesh and from Rs 70/kg to Rs 127/kg in Karnataka during the corresponding period. Thus, it is proved that such a policy for regulation was not in place kind of regulatory ecosystem has imparted production stability and price stability. However, for other commercial crops, such a policy for regulation was not in place for other commercial crops such as chilli, turmeric, tomato, and onion which experience high price volatility. Thus, there is an immediate need for such crops to have a similar kind of policy intervention to ensure better prices and augment farmers’ income to protect farmer producers and consumers from violent price fluctuations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Reddy et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecfe9b9154b0b82876e96https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.400047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 16. Understanding Supply-Price Relation in Indian Agriculture Markets: A case of Tomato, Onion, and Potato2025
  2. 220. Understanding Supply-Price Relation in Indian Agriculture Markets: A case of Tomato, Onion, and Potato2025
  3. 3Why price volatility matters? Case of onion and tomato markets in Karnataka2018
  4. 47. Impact on Agricultural value chain commodity market in India2025
  5. 5Market vulnerabilities and potential of horticulture crops in India: With special reference to top crops2021