PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Post-war Victimization in Israeli Aggression against Iran (2025) From the Perspective of Cultural Criminology

View Full Paper
MEMahdi Khaghani Esfahani

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how Israeli aggression erodes social cohesion in Iran, normalizing violence and creating a cycle of victimization.
  • Analyzed the impact of Israeli aggression on Iranian society and culture post-2025.
  • Investigated relationships between symbolic violence, media discourse, and daily life.
  • Proposed shifts in criminal policy from security-based to cultural and restorative approaches.
  • Aggression led to urban displacement and economic collapse in Iran, fracturing societal cohesion.
  • Fear and normalization of aggression increased post-war violence and victimization in daily life.
  • Proposed policy changes emphasize cultural restoration to rebuild trust and meaning in society.

Abstract

The Israeli aggression against Iran in June 2025—targeting defense infrastructure, military personnel, civilians including scientists, children, and women, as well as hospitals, schools, and national media—was not merely a military confrontation but a turning point in the collective and psychological victimization of Iranian society. The ensuing fear, urban displacement, partial economic collapse, and existential anxiety fractured Iran’s cultural and moral fabric, creating conditions for new forms of post-war violence. This study examines how collective victimization reproduces violence and breaks norms in the post-war context both at cultural and psychological levels, and explores the relationship between symbolic violence in media, political discourse, and everyday life (routine activity criminology). The central premise posits that aggression —and the enduring fear of its recurrence—erodes social cohesion, normalizes aggression, and embeds violent cultural patterns into civic life, generating a cyclical process of victimization and offending, wherein society itself perpetuates violence. From a cultural criminological perspective, this cycle reflects a normalization of deviance and a redefinition of social power through violence. Breaking it requires a shift in Iran’s criminal policy from a security-based to a cultural and restorative approach at legislative, judicial, and executive levels—prioritizing the symbolic reconstruction of trust, hope, and meaning alongside structural post-war recovery.The central hypothesis posits that aggression —and the enduring fear of its recurrence—erodes social cohesion, normalizes aggression, and embeds violent cultural patterns into civic life, generating a cyclical process of victimization and offending wherein society itself perpetuates violence. From a cultural criminological perspective, this cycle reflects a normalization of deviance and a redefinition of social power through violence. Breaking it requires a shift in Iran’s criminal policy from a security-based to a cultural and restorative approach at legislative, judicial, and executive levels—prioritizing the symbolic reconstruction of trust, hope, and

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mahdi Khaghani Esfahani (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed021b9154b0b82877222https://doi.org/10.22059/wsps.2026.409406.1571
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper