PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Clinical and Translational Science0 citationsOpen Access

519 Clinical translation of quantitative ultrasound for nail disease: Bridging imaging biophysics and dermatology

NGNuran GolbasiCHCameron HoerigSLShari R. Lipner

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the clinical feasibility of quantitative ultrasound in diagnosing various nail diseases.
  • Prospective evaluation of 26 patients with onychomycosis and inflammatory nail diseases using 15-MHz ultrasound.
  • Raw radio-frequency data were processed to derive three quantitative ultrasound parameters: Homodyned-K [α], effective scatterer diameter (ESD), and effective acoustic concentration (EAC).
  • Parameters were analyzed using t-tests and mixed-effects models to evaluate reproducibility and differentiation between disease states.
  • Diseased fingernails showed a significant reduction in microstructural organization (α −1.11, p < 0.001) compared to controls.
  • Effective scatterer diameter (ESD) increased in onychomycosis (+0.85, p = 0.02), indicating coarser scatterers in fungal disease.
  • EAC was significantly elevated in lichen planus (+1.30, p < 0.01), reflecting fibrotic regions.

Abstract

Objectives/Goals: To translate quantitative ultrasound (QUS) from imaging biophysics into clinical dermatology by evaluating its reproducibility, diagnostic differentiation, and potential as a noninvasive, point-of-care tool for nail disease assessment. Methods/Study Population: Diagnosing nail disease is difficult due to overlapping features and the invasiveness of biopsy. In a prospective study (recruitment ongoing), patients with onychomycosis, inflammatory nail disease (psoriasis or lichen planus), and controls underwent 15-MHz ultrasound of fingernails and toenails (n = 26 patients, 152 nails). Raw radio-frequency data were processed to derive three QUS parameters: Homodyned-K α (microstructural organization), effective scatterer diameter (ESD) (scatterer size reflecting tissue texture), and effective acoustic concentration (EAC) (scatterer density reflecting compactness). Metrics were analyzed with t-tests and mixed-effects models. Within-patient consistency and parameter reproducibility were evaluated to assess clinical translation feasibility. Results/Anticipated Results: Diseased fingernails (33 vs 54 controls) showed reduced α (−1.11, p < 0.001), reflecting loss of microstructural organization. Onychomycosis had the largest change (−1.25), while inflammatory nails were moderately reduced (−0.93). ESD showed opposite trends (+0.85, p = 0.02) indicating coarser scatterers in fungal disease, and EAC was uniquely elevated in lichen planus (+1.30, p < 0.01), consistent with fibrotic regions. In the toenail cohort (16 diseased vs 49 controls), onychomycosis showed parallel changes (α −0.9, p < 0.001; ESD +1.0, p = 0.02), supporting reproducibility across nail sites. Findings were confirmed by mixed-effects models. Together, these parameters quantify disease-specific microstructure and demonstrate technical and biological feasibility for clinical translation. Discussion/Significance of Impact: QUS provides interpretable biophysical markers that differentiate fungal, inflammatory, and fibrotic nail diseases. By bridging imaging physics with clinical diagnosis, QUS offers a scalable, noninvasive approach for point-of-care dermatologic imaging and advances the translation of QUS into practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Golbasi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed021b9154b0b82877329https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10640
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper