PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Operations Management Research0 citationsOpen Access

Framework to assess the sustainability impact of digital technological solutions in agriculture

VLVerónica León-BravoCCChiara CorboSMSandra Cesari De Maria

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a framework that evaluates the sustainability performance of digital agricultural technological solutions (DATS).
  • Developed an assessment framework through the analysis of 30 agricultural cases in Europe.
  • Combined top-down and bottom-up approaches to identify relevant indicators.
  • Evaluated costs and benefits of DATS using a dual lens of monetary and non-monetary assessments.
  • The framework provides a feasible subset of indicators that connect theory and practice.
  • It allows for the evaluation of both monetary and non-monetary impacts of DATS.
  • Develops a dynamic assessment tool suitable for multi-season analysis of DATS adoption.

Abstract

Abstract This research develops a managerial tool to monitor and evaluate the sustainability performance of Digital Agricultural Technological Solutions (DATS). This tool is an assessment framework designed to evaluate both the benefits (monetary and non-monetary) and costs of DATS’s implementation. The assessment framework is developed with the study of 30 cases in Europe, working with different crops and breeds, with and without DATS. The framework is developed in three phases. First, it combines top-down and bottom-up approaches to identify the most relevant assessment categories, subcategories, and key performance indicators from a sustainability perspective, according to the type of technology adopted and the process in which the DATS are implemented. Next, the assessment framework design involves determining the calculation methods, considering both monetary and non-monetary evaluations. Finally, the framework is applied to each case to evaluate the costs and benefits, as well as the appropriateness and feasibility of the performance calculations. The contributions of the study to literature and practice are threefold, i) developing an assessment framework with a feasible and affordable subset of indicators linking theory and reality, ii) combining a dual lens assessment in monetary and non-monetary terms, and, iii) develop a dynamic living assessment tool that facilitates processing information about DATS adoption in a multi-season perspective. In the future, researchers could further refine, replicate and expand the use of the assessment framework in other geographies or for specific DATS or agricultural sectors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

León-Bravo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0abb9154b0b82877ba7https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-026-00593-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper