PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Ocean & Coastal Management1 citationsOpen Access

How applicable is POLARIS to the ice-covered Northern Baltic Sea?

View Full Paper
LLLiangliang LuFLFang LiJRJon-Arve Røyset

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of the POLARIS system in evaluating navigational risks in the Northern Baltic Sea.
  • Utilized high-resolution ice data and historical hull damage records for analysis
  • Examined operational icebreaker assistance logs for practical insight
  • Conducted comparisons of Risk Index Outcomes with real-world damage and assistance requests
  • POLARIS underestimated operational risks in the Northern Baltic Sea, particularly for ships of higher ice classes.
  • Recommendations include adjusting Risk Index Values to better reflect actual risk levels in this region.
  • Findings suggest a need for calibration of POLARIS for specific sub-Arctic conditions.

Abstract

The Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS) provides a structured and widely recognized framework for evaluating navigational safety in ice-covered waters. Its integration into the IMO Polar Code reflects its importance in supporting voyage planning and risk mitigation in Arctic and Antarctic contexts. However, the applicability of POLARIS to sub-Arctic seas with distinct operational characteristics, such as the Northern Baltic Sea, remains largely unexplored. This study provides a systematic investigation of POLARIS in this region utilizing a combination of high-resolution ice data, detailed historical hull damage records, and operational icebreaker assistance logs, offering both quantitative validation and practical insight into POLARIS performance. The dual comparison with real-world damage incidents and captain-driven icebreaker requests enables a uniquely holistic evaluation of how well POLARIS-derived Risk Index Outcomes (RIOs) reflect actual navigational risk. The analysis reveals that POLARIS generally underestimates operational risks in this region, especially for ships with higher ice classes (IAS, IA, and IB), which are assumed to tolerate harsher conditions but in reality still encounter significant limitations. This discrepancy aligns with prior findings that have pointed to the system's “flexibility” in Arctic applications, and it further underscores the need for region-specific calibration. In light of these results, a downward adjustment of the Risk Index Values (RIVs) is recommended for use in the Northern Baltic context to improve alignment between calculated and perceived risk levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0abb9154b0b82877cf9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2026.108217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper