PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative study of armchair and zigzag graphene quantum dots as HIV-1 protease inhibitors

AIAmina IbrahimHEHanan ElhaesMGM G.Ibrahim

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness of different graphene quantum dots as inhibitors of HIV-1 protease.
  • Utilized density functional theory (DFT) with B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) to evaluate electronic properties and dipole moments.
  • Conducted quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analysis to assess atomic bonding interactions.
  • Investigated five types of graphene quantum dots, including pristine and triangular and hexagonal cuts.
  • Modified graphene quantum dots showed the ability to bind with two aspartic acid residues, forming stable complexes.
  • Analysis indicated significant differences in binding efficiency among armchair and zigzag configurations.
  • Study suggests modified GQDs as promising candidates for HIV-1 protease inhibition.

Abstract

Abstract In this study, five distinct types of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) which included pristine graphene and three types of triangular cuts which had both armchair and zigzag ends and two types of hexagonal cuts which had both armchair and zigzag ends. Density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP/6-31G(d, p) method was used to determine total dipole moment (TDM) values and to analyze HOMO-LUMO energy gaps and molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) and the vibrational spectra of the researched models. The study utilized quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analysis to assess the bonding relationships between the atoms. The results demonstrate that the modified GQDs can bind with two aspartic acid residues to create stable complexes. The study demonstrates that modified GQDs can function as potential candidates for use as HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ibrahim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed140b9154b0b8287883ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48709-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper