PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026African Journal of Ecology0 citations

The Behavioural Patterns and Variation in Home Range Size of a Small Sample of Temminck's Pangolins Following Rehabilitation and Release

View Full Paper
LSLeandra StracquadanioECEleanor ComleyCMChimwemwe Kalulu Mponda

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore home range establishment and behavior in rehabilitated Temminck's pangolins following their release.
  • Utilized satellite and VHF tags on eight pangolins for up to 5.5 months for post-release monitoring.
  • Calculated home range sizes using kernel density analysis.
  • Observed changes in home range size and the influence of various factors on these sizes.
  • Average total home range size was 5.56 km² (SD = ±5.333) during the exploratory period.
  • Home ranges were established after a mean of 8 weeks, with a subsequent decrease to a mean of 1.37 km² (SD = ±0.9).
  • Individuals released during the wet season exhibited larger home ranges.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Temminck's pangolins ( Smutsia temminckii ) are an elusive, low‐density species with several knowledge gaps surrounding their ecology, including home range establishment. In Malawi, pangolins face ongoing threats from poaching and electric fencing which often results in them needing medical care. Lilongwe Wildlife Trust rehabilitates these pangolins and releases them back into the wild. Using satellite and VHF tags deployed on eight pangolins for up to 5.5 months for post‐release monitoring, home range sizes were calculated using kernel density analysis. The average total home range size was found to be 5.56 km 2 (SD = ±5.333), including an exploratory period where individuals investigated their new surroundings. Individuals established home ranges after a mean of 8 weeks, but up to 16 weeks. After establishment, home range sizes decreased (mean of 1.37 km 2 , SD = ±0.9). No clear effects of poaching history, rehabilitation length or body mass on home range size were detected. Individuals which underwent the release period in the wet season had larger home ranges. These results suggest that intensive, resource‐heavy monitoring beyond 16 weeks may not be needed, although longer monitoring may be required for some individuals on a case‐by‐case basis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stracquadanio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed19ab9154b0b82879082https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.70179
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper