PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026PLoS Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Optimal minimal residual disease threshold in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective cohort study based on the TARGET database

View Full Paper
XLXiong‐yu LiaoHZHong ZhengJFJian-pei Fang

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of two minimal residual disease thresholds in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.
  • Retrospective cohort study using TARGET-AML database with 1,205 pediatric patients.
  • Compared conventional MRD threshold (≥0.1%) with a lower threshold (≥0.05%) after induction courses.
  • Used Kaplan−Meier survival estimates, Cox proportional hazards models, and ROC curves for analysis.
  • The optimal threshold for predicting 5-year event-free survival was found to be 0.05% after both induction courses.
  • The 0.05% threshold had higher hazard ratios (HR = 2.8, P < 0.001 after course 1; HR = 3.7, P < 0.001 after course 2).
  • Net reclassification improvement confirmed significant risk classification enhancement with the 0.05% threshold.

Abstract

Background Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is a cornerstone of risk stratification in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with a threshold of 0.1% conventionally defining positivity by flow cytometry. Advances in flow cytometric technologies, enabling detection of leukemic cells with higher sensitivity and specificity, warrant a reevaluation of whether a lower threshold improves prognostic accuracy. Methods and findings We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET)-AML initiative. The study population comprised 1,205 pediatric patients with de novo AML treated across Children’s Oncology Group (COG) clinical trial centers. Patients were enrolled between September 1996 and December 2016, with a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range: 0.5–20.1 years). The primary objective was to compare the prognostic performance of the traditional MRD threshold (≥0.1%) with a lower threshold (≥0.05%) after induction courses 1 and 2. The main outcome measure was 5-year event-free survival (EFS). Analyses included Kaplan−Meier survival estimates, Cox proportional hazards models to calculate hazard ratios ( HR ) with 95% confidence intervals ( CI ), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and net reclassification improvement (NRI). The optimal threshold for predicting 5-year EFS, determined by ROC analysis, was 0.05% after both induction course 1 (AUC: 0.840, 95% CI 0.76,0.88) and course 2 (AUC: 0.854, 95% CI 0.78,0.89). The 0.05% threshold demonstrated higher HR for the first event than the 0.1% threshold (after course 1: HR = 2.8, 95% CI 2.3,3.3; P < 0.001; after course 2: HR = 3.7, 95% CI 3.0,4.6; P < 0.001). NRI analysis confirmed significant improvement in risk classification with the 0.05% threshold (overall NRI: 0.15 after course 1, 0.18 after course 2). The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design using historical data from trials conducted over 20 years, which may limit generalizability to contemporary treatments. Conclusions A lower MRD threshold of 0.05% provides superior prognostic discrimination compared to the conventional 0.1% threshold in pediatric AML treated in previous COG trials. These findings support testing this more sensitive threshold in future clinical trial designs for improved risk-adapted therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00205ec8f74e3340f9b43chttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1005088
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper