PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Expert Review of Medical Devices0 citations

Function and fatigue monitoring in neuromuscular electrically‑evoked exercise after spinal cord injury

View Full Paper
NHNur Azah HamzaidJNJannatul Naeem

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize evidence on monitoring function and fatigue during electrical stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury.
  • Reviewed control-system components for functional electrical stimulation (FES) in spinal cord injury.
  • Synthesized evidence from various sensors including kinematic and kinetic sensors and muscle-level sensors.
  • Outlined modulation strategies for stimulation parameters within open- and closed-loop architectures.
  • Effective fatigue management in closed-loop systems is crucial for maximizing training session duration.
  • Strategies like frequency-aware controllers and mechanomyography are prioritized for improving fatigue monitoring.
  • Asynchronous stimulation methods can enhance the feasibility and usability of FES systems.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can restore or augment movement in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), yet rapid neuromuscular fatigue limits training duration and the feasibility of closed‑loop control. AREAS COVERED: We review FES control‑system components and sensory feedback modalities used to monitor function and fatigue in SCI, synthesizing evidence from kinetic and kinematic sensors, namely joint angle, torque, center of pressure, and muscle‑level sensors such as surface/evoked electromyography, mechanomyography, ultrasound, and electroencephalography. We outline how stimulation parameters i.e. amplitude, frequency, pulse width, are modulated within open‑ and closed‑loop architectures and summarize strategies to mitigate fatigue - frequency‑aware controllers, asynchronous/multiped stimulation. EXPERT OPINION: Limited focus on fatigue is concerning, as effective fatigue management is crucial for developing closed-loop FES systems that support longer training sessions and improve long-term effectiveness and usability of rehabilitation interventions. Fatigue management must be embedded, not appended, within closed‑loop FES. Priority areas include frequency‑aware controllers, asynchronous/ multipad stimulation, and robust muscle‑state sensing, particularly mechanomyography and ultrasound, that is less vulnerable to stimulation artifacts than surface EMG.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hamzaid et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002087c8f74e3340f9b6dehttps://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2026.2671939
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper