This paper reflects on the methodological challenges of studying uncomfortable otherness – otherness that is in tension with prevailing academic positions or that clashes with disciplinary approaches (by affecting the existence of diversities and minorities) – thus constituting uncommon objects of study in anthropology. In this case, I draw on my experience working with conservative and traditionalist Catholic sectors that participate in public life in various ways. Both my current research with those involved in politics and previous studies allow me to delve deeper into how Anthropology approaches (if indeed it does) uncomfortable otherness. Among other aspects, I expose the importance of reconstructing the interest on these otherness and the inputs and challenges that other researchers represent. This work aims to discuss the implications of this type of research for researchers as well as the necessary distance, the impact, strategies for access and engagement, and other issues involved in studying these objects .
María Bargo (Fri,) studied this question.