PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

The Impact of Digital Infrastructure Construction on Urban–Rural Consumption Inequality in China: Evidence from Difference-in-Differences and Double Machine Learning

View Full Paper
YLYi LuoDZDuxuan ZengJZJian Zhu

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze how digital infrastructure construction affects urban–rural consumption inequality in China.
  • Exploited the staggered rollout of the 'Broadband China' strategy as a quasi-natural experiment.
  • Utilized a city-level panel of 277 prefecture-level cities in China from 2012 to 2023.
  • Applied a two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences framework combined with double machine learning.
  • Digital infrastructure construction significantly reduces urban–rural consumption inequality, indicating a convergence in consumption patterns.
  • Mechanism analysis suggests industrial structural transformation and consumption scenario innovation are key drivers.
  • The positive impact of digital infrastructure is more considerable in central regions and cities with lower economic development.

Abstract

Bridging urban–rural consumption inequality (URCI) is crucial for achieving sustainable and inclusive development. Although the welfare implications of digital infrastructure construction (DIC) have attracted increasing attention, evidence on its effect on URCI remains limited. This study exploits the staggered rollout of the “Broadband China” strategy as a quasi-natural experiment and estimates the effect of DIC on URCI using a city-level panel of 277 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2012 to 2023. The empirical analysis combines a two-way fixed effects DID frame-work with double machine learning and a series of robustness checks. The results show (a) that DIC significantly reduces URCI, suggesting that digital infrastructure contributes to urban–rural consumption convergence; (b) mechanism analysis provides suggestive evidence consistent with two potential mechanisms: industrial structural transformation, reflected in industrial upgrading and industrial rationalization, and consumption scenario innovation, proxied by the expansion of digitally enabled consumption environments. Nonparametric bootstrap evidence further supports the presence of indirect associations through these mechanisms; (c) heterogeneity analysis shows that the mitigating effect of DIC is more pronounced in the central region, in cities with lower levels of economic development, and in cities with weaker innovation capacity, suggesting higher marginal returns to digital infrastructure in areas with less developed digital and consumption ecosystems. These findings highlight the inclusive role of digital infrastructure in reducing consumption inequality and provide policy-relevant evidence for promoting balanced urban–rural development in China and other developing economies pursuing digital infrastructure expansion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00217ac8f74e3340f9c4f0https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104707
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper