Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) antibodies are critical biomarkers in myositis, associated with distinct clinical features and prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of anti-MDA5 positivity and compare the diagnostic performance of local immunoblotting (IB) with gold-standard immunoprecipitation (IP). We performed a retrospective analysis of 3272 physician-requested anti-MDA5 IB determinations over a five-year period (2019–2023). A subsequent exploratory pilot study of ten Hungarian patients with myositis was conducted to compare IB results with radiolabeled protein IP. Confirmatory in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to distinguish between 140 kDa bands (anti-MDA5 vs. anti-NXP2). Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells was also evaluated. In the retrospective cohort, 3.7% (n = 121) of samples were non-negative. Among 64 borderline patients, only one (1.6%) had a definitive diagnosis of dermatomyositis (DM). Conversely, the proportion of confirmed myositis cases was notably higher among patients with strong positive IB results. In our exploratory cross-sectional pilot study, complete concordance between the two assays was observed for negative and strong positive results. Discrepancies were noted in borderline and weak positivity ranges, where anti-MDA5 was not detected by IP; instead, alternative autoantibodies were identified. The three IP-confirmed MDA5 positive samples were all validated by ELISA. The characteristic IIF cytoplasmic staining was identifiable in 2 out of 10 cases (20%). In our cohort, borderline IB cases were frequently potential false positives, highlighting the need for careful clinical evaluation. Borderline and weak results require clinical correlation or confirmatory testing to avoid misdiagnosis.
Mogyoróssy et al. (Fri,) studied this question.