PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026Journal of Applied Econometrics0 citationsOpen Access

Improving the Finite Sample Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using Double/Debiased Machine Learning With Propensity Score Calibration

View Full Paper
DBDaniele BallinariNBNora Bearth

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance the accuracy of average treatment effect estimates using a calibrated propensity score within the double/debiased machine learning framework.
  • Integrates calibration approaches into the double/debiased machine learning framework.
  • Utilizes simulations to assess the impact of calibrated propensity scores on estimation accuracy.
  • Focuses on reducing root mean squared error of average treatment effect estimates.
  • Calibrated propensity scores significantly reduce the root mean squared error of average treatment effect estimates.
  • Maintains asymptotic properties of double/debiased machine learning in finite samples.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Double/debiased machine learning (DML) uses for estimating an average treatment effect (ATE) a double‐robust score function that relies on the prediction of nuisance functions, such as the propensity score, which is the probability of treatment assignment given covariates. Estimators relying on double‐robust score functions are highly sensitive to errors in propensity score predictions. Machine learning algorithms have been found to produce models that often overestimate or underestimate these probabilities. Several calibration approaches have been proposed to improve probabilistic forecasts of machine learners. This paper explores their integration into the DML framework, showing via simulations that using calibrated propensity scores significantly reduces the root mean squared error of ATE estimates in finite samples while preserving DML's asymptotic properties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ballinari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002222c8f74e3340f9d114https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.70057
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Calibration of Machine Learning Models2010 · 55 citations
  2. 2Analysis of Semiparametric Regression Models for Repeated Outcomes in the Presence of Missing Data1995 · 1,552 citations
  3. 3The Isotonic Regression Problem and its Dual1972 · 244 citations
  4. 4Regularized calibrated estimation of propensity scores with model misspecification and high-dimensional data2019 · 82 citations
  5. 5The Impact of Active Labour Market Programmes on the Duration of Unemployment in Switzerland2007 · 100 citations