PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2026BMC Medical Education0 citationsOpen Access

Integration of exercise and sports medicine curriculum in China: a structured pilot course evaluation conducted among medical students

LGLiu GuochunQCQing ChangDFDing Fu

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of a structured sports and exercise medicine curriculum on medical students' competencies in exercise prescription.
  • Medical students (n=10) participated in a 4-week structured sports and exercise medicine curriculum.
  • Control group (n=14) received no training; both groups completed knowledge tests and a questionnaire pre- and post-course.
  • Outcomes were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and t tests.
  • Students in the SEMc group demonstrated significant improvement in knowledge, with scores rising from 95.2 ± 3.3 vs. 66.6 ± 17.1 (p < 0.001).
  • Skills improved from 3.43 ± 0.67 to 4.18 ± 0.54 (p = 0.030) and confidence from 3.52 ± 0.55 to 4.07 ± 0.58 (p = 0.046).
  • Post-intervention, the SEMc group scored higher than controls in knowledge (p = 0.020), skills (p < 0.001), and confidence (p = 0.002).

Abstract

Abstract Background The integration of sports and exercise medicine curriculum (SEMc) including physical activity promotion and exercise prescription competencies into medical curricula is increasingly recognised within health profession education (HPE), yet evidence of its educational impact remains limited. This study evaluated the effects of a structured SEMc on medical students’ knowledge, skills, confidence, and attitudes in exercise prescription. Methods Medical students ( n = 10) completed a 4-week SEMc on the basis of international frameworks and China’s national guidelines; controls ( n = 14) received no training. All participants completed baseline and post-course knowledge tests and a course-developed questionnaire with high internal consistency.The outcomes were analysed via repeated-measures ANOVA and t tests. Results Participation in the SEMc significantly enhanced medical students’ competency in exercise prescription. Students who received training demonstrated substantial gains in knowledge, with scores improving from baseline and exceeding those of controls at post-assessment (95.2 ± 3.3 vs. 66.6 ± 17.1; p 0.10). At post-intervention, the SEMc group scored higher than controls in knowledge ( p = 0.020), skills ( p < 0.001), and confidence ( p = 0.002). Conclusion In this quasi-experimental pilot study, a brief, structured SEMc was associated with improvements in medical students’ exercise prescription–related knowledge, skills, and confidence. Embedding SEMc into mainstream curricula may equip future physicians with essential capacities for chronic disease prevention, aligning with the WHO’s Global Action Plan on Physical Activity. Graphical Abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guochun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002222c8f74e3340f9d127https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09013-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper