PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 3, 2022IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics45 citations

Anomaly Detection and Correction of Optimizing Autonomous Systems With Inverse Reinforcement Learning

View Full Paper
BLBosen LianYKYusuf KartalFLFrank L. Lewis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article considers autonomous systems whose behaviors seek to optimize an objective function. This goes beyond standard applications of condition-based maintenance, which seeks to detect faults or failures in nonoptimizing systems. Normal agents optimize a known accepted objective function, whereas abnormal or misbehaving agents may optimize a renegade objective that does not conform to the accepted one. We provide a unified framework for anomaly detection and correction in optimizing autonomous systems described by differential equations using inverse reinforcement learning (RL). We first define several types of anomalies and false alarms, including noise anomaly, objective function anomaly, intention (control gain) anomaly, abnormal behaviors, noise-anomaly false alarms, and objective false alarms. We then propose model-free inverse RL algorithms to reconstruct the objective functions and intentions for given system behaviors. The inverse RL procedure for anomaly detection and correction has the training phase, detection phase, and correction phase. First, inverse RL in the training phase infers the objective function and intention of the normal behavior system using offline stored data. Second, in the detection phase, inverse RL infers the objective function and intention for online observed test system behaviors using online observation data. They are then compared with that of the nominal system to identify anomalies. Third, correction is executed for the anomalous system to learn the normal objective and intention. Simulations and experiments on a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) verify the proposed methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lian et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a004d694716aad0cc85a47chttps://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2022.3213526
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Synthesis of Human-in-the-Loop Control Protocols for Autonomous Systems2016 · 101 citations
  2. 2Event-Triggered Fault Detection Filter Design for a Continuous-Time Networked Control System2016 · 238 citations
  3. 3A Reinforcement Learning-Based Network Traffic Prediction Mechanism in Intelligent Internet of Things2020 · 89 citations
  4. 4Anomaly detection in aircraft data using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)2016 · 227 citations
  5. 5Fault Detection for T-S Fuzzy Time-Delay Systems: Delta Operator and Input-Output Methods2014 · 237 citations