PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 20260 citations

Ultrasound gap measurement after acute Achilles rupture is reliable overall but uncertain near a 5-mm decision threshold.

View Full Paper
DMDan MocanuKBKatarzyna Bokwa‐DąbrowskaELElin Larsson

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the reliability of ultrasound gap measurements after acute Achilles tendon ruptures and identify classification uncertainty around a key 5-mm threshold.
  • Retrospective observer-agreement study using stored ultrasound cine loops from a prospectively collected cohort of 30 acute ruptures.
  • Two blinded radiologists measured tendon-gap distances in two sessions, calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and other reliability metrics.
  • Cohen's κ and Gwet's AC1 evaluated agreement at the 5-mm decision threshold.
  • Intra-rater ICCs were 0.88 and 0.94; SEM values were 1.57 mm and 1.19 mm.
  • Moderate agreement at the 5-mm cut-point was indicated by κ = 0.60 and AC1 = 0.61, with 6 out of 30 classifications differing.
  • SEM-based confidence zones ranged from ≤ 2.42 mm or ≥ 7.58 mm for one rater and ≤ 3.04 mm or ≥ 6.96 mm for another, suggesting a grey zone for classification.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound gap distance has been proposed as a supportive triage input within protocol-based pathways after acute Achilles tendon rupture. We assessed intra-/inter-rater reliability of gap measurement and the extent of classification uncertainty around a 5-mm threshold. Retrospective observer-agreement study without a definitive reference standard, using protocol-acquired stored ultrasound cine loops from 30 clinically diagnosed complete acute ruptures in a prospectively collected cohort. METHODS: Retrospective observer-agreement study without a definitive reference standard, using protocol-acquired stored ultrasound cine loops from 30 clinically diagnosed complete acute ruptures in a prospectively collected cohort. Two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists re-reviewed stored cine loops and measured tendon-gap distance in two sessions each (≥ 4 weeks apart). We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and standard error of measurement (SEM). Agreement at the 5-mm protocol cut-point was assessed using Cohen's κ and Gwet's AC1. Using SEM, we derived 90% confidence zones indicating firm classification versus a grey zone where repeat measurement or second read may be considered. RESULTS: Intra-rater ICC(2,1) was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.91) and 0.94 (0.82-0.97); SEMs were 1.57 and 1.19 mm. Inter-rater bias was + 1.12 mm with LoA - 3.85 to 6.10 mm. Agreement for study experimental pathway classification at the 5-mm cut-point (operative vs non-operative) was moderate (κ = 0.60; AC1 = 0.61), with 6/30 examinations classified differently. SEM-based 90% zones were ≤ 2.42 and ≥ 7.58 mm (rater 1) and ≤ 3.04 and ≥ 6.96 mm (rater 2); a conservative cross-rater rule suggested ≤ 2.05 or ≥ 7.95 mm. CONCLUSION: Gap measurement shows good relative reliability, but uncertainty near 5 mm can alter classification. Reporting LoA/SEM alongside ICC and flagging a grey zone may reduce misclassification in borderline cases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mocanu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01720a3a9f334c282720dahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-026-05243-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper