PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology0 citationsOpen Access

Heart Failure Prevention

View Full Paper
JBJaved ButlerMKMuhammad Shahzeb KhanJFJoão Pedro Ferreira

Key Result

This review addresses practical challenges in defining incident heart failure and summarizes the landscape of current and ongoing primary prevention trials to identify evidence gaps.

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the gaps in current heart failure prevention strategies and the need for a comprehensive approach.
  • Comprehensive review of the literature on heart failure prevention strategies and regulatory pathways.
  • Analysis of current and ongoing prevention trials related to heart failure.
  • Discussion on defining incident heart failure and its implications in both outpatient and hospitalization settings.
  • The existing guidelines support the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but lack specific measures for heart failure prevention.
  • Significant gaps in therapy approval for primary heart failure prevention were identified, emphasizing the need for new strategies.
  • Challenges in defining incident heart failure highlight the necessity for reevaluating preventive approaches, addressing both conventional and nonatherosclerotic causes.

PICO

P
Population
Heart failure

Limitations

  • Defining and adjudicating incident HF is challenging.
  • Most trials report initial HF hospitalizations only, ignoring outpatient settings where most HF is diagnosed.

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a public health challenge with high morbidity and mortality risk, and societal economic costs. The lifetime risk of developing HF stands at 1 in 4. A significant portion of the population already is in precursor stages, with roughly two-thirds of adults in the United States classified as either stage A (at risk) or stage B (pre-HF). Despite advances in drugs and device-based therapies, once HF develops, these patients remain at an unacceptably high risk for mortality, morbidity, and adverse health status, underscoring the need for focus on primary prevention of HF. The prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is supported by established guidelines with clear targets and pharmacotherapies with specific labels for prevention. However, prevention of HF remains less well established. No therapeutic agent is approved yet specifically for the primary prevention of HF. Defining and adjudicating incident HF is challenging. Most trials report initial HF hospitalizations only. The conventional hospitalization-based definition of incident HF does not take into account outpatient settings where most HF is diagnosed. A fundamental reevaluation of preventive strategies for HF is required, moving incrementally from coronary disease-based approaches to more global populations, because many HF cases arise from nonatherosclerotic causes, such as obesity, hypertension, cancer therapies, and the cardio-kidney-metabolic syndrome. This review addresses practical challenges in defining incident HF, trial duration, and regulatory pathways, while summarizing the landscape of current and ongoing prevention trials, identifying evidence gaps, and highlighting future priorities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Butler et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure. This review addresses practical challenges in defining incident heart failure and summarizes the landscape of current and ongoing primary prevention trials to identify evidence gaps.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a025a549cddff7633412b54https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.029
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper