Fully automated multi-loop artificial intelligence systematically underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volume by a median of 56.8 ml compared to cardiac magnetic resonance, a known limitation also observed in human expert assessments.
Observational (n=102)
No
Does fully automated AI accurately assess left ventricular end-diastolic volume compared to expert echocardiographers and cardiac magnetic resonance in adult cardiology patients?
Fully automated AI for echocardiographic LVEDV assessment shows strong internal consistency but systematically underestimates volumes compared to CMR, similar to the underestimation observed with human experts.
Absolute Event Rate: -56.8% vs -32.5%
Mołek-Dziadosz et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Cardiac remodeling / Left ventricular volume assessment (n=102). Artificial intelligence (multi-loop and single-loop AI) echocardiography analysis vs. Expert echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Median bias in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) compared to CMR (ml). Fully automated multi-loop artificial intelligence systematically underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volume by a median of 56.8 ml compared to cardiac magnetic resonance, a known limitation also observed in human expert assessments.