PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Cardiovascular revascularization medicine0 citations

Temporal change in patients with mitral annular calcification after successful aortic valve intervention

View Full Paper
OAOwais S. Abdul-KafiMCMaroun ChedidTATremayne Ansani

Key Result

Aortic valve replacement without mitral intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis and mild-to-moderate mitral disease from MAC resulted in no significant change in MS or MR severity.

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the progression of mitral valve disease following aortic valve replacement in patients with mitral annular calcification.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 147 patients with mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation and mitral annular calcification undergoing aortic valve replacement from 2012 to 2022.
  • Follow-up duration averaged 2.0 years to analyze changes in mitral valve severity, left ventricular ejection fraction, and survival probability.
  • Analysis included baseline characteristics, with the majority of patients categorized as NYHA class III prior to intervention.
  • No significant change in mitral stenosis or mitral regurgitation severity after 2.0 years post-intervention (p=0.47).
  • The study found that patients did not require mitral valve intervention during the follow-up period.
  • Majority of patients had mild to moderate mitral valve disease at baseline, with no deterioration noted.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=147)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does aortic valve replacement (AVR) without mitral intervention lead to progression of mitral valve disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant mitral annular calcification?

P
Population
147 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and concomitant mild to moderate mitral stenosis (MS) or mitral regurgitation (MR) from mitral annular calcification (MAC) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). Mean age 78 ± 10 years, 66% female, 70% NYHA class III.
I
Intervention
Aortic valve replacement (AVR), predominantly transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (93%), sparing the mitral valve.
O
Outcome
Rate of progression for mitral regurgitation (MR), mitral stenosis (MS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and survival probability at a median follow-up of 2.0 (1.24-3.70) years.

In patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant mild-to-moderate mitral valve disease from mitral annular calcification, isolated aortic valve replacement does not lead to significant progression of mitral disease over a median 2-year follow-up.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.47

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and concomitant mild to moderate mitral stenosis (MS) or mitral regurgitation (MR) from mitral annular calcification (MAC) often undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) while sparing the mitral valve. This study aimed to analyze the rate of progression of mitral valve disease in patients with MAC undergoing AVR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 147 patients with MS and/or MR and MAC undergoing AVR at Allina Health in 2012-2022. The rate of progression for MR, MS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and survival probability were assessed at a median follow-up of 2.0 (1.24-3.70) years. RESULTS: The mean age was 78 ± 10 years. Most patients were female (66%) with NYHA class III symptoms (70%) prior to AVR, and the majority underwent TAVR (93%). Most patients had MS ranging from trace to moderate range (90%) and MR ranging from trace to moderate range (91%) prior to the procedure. There was no significant change in MS or MR severity, or mortality (p = 0.47) based on MAC severity within the follow up duration. CONCLUSION: Overall, patients with MAC with moderate or less MS and/or MR and aortic stenosis had no significant change in MS or MR severity and no need for mitral valve intervention during 6 years of follow-up after AVR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdul-Kafi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic valve stenosis with concomitant mild to moderate mitral stenosis or regurgitation from mitral annular calcification (n=147). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) sparing the mitral valve was evaluated on Rate of progression for MR, MS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and survival probability (p=0.47). Aortic valve replacement without mitral intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis and mild-to-moderate mitral disease from MAC resulted in no significant change in MS or MR severity.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a025cd8edf6f48138594a62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper