PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 2026Social Science & Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Ranking Group-Level Outcomes with Multilevel Models: An Information-Theoretic Measure of Statistical Separation

View Full Paper
NBNasir Z. BashirJMJuan MerloGLGeorge Leckie

Key Points

  • The study aims to quantify uncertainty in the ordering of predicted group-level outcomes using a new statistical measure.
  • Developed an entropy-based separation statistic for quantifying group-level predictions.
  • Applied the separation statistic to examples from Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA).
  • Provided R and Stata code for implementation in analyses.
  • Introduced a new metric that quantifies the stability of group-level rankings based on predictions.
  • Demonstrated the application of the separation statistic in both Bayesian and frequentist contexts.
  • Highlighted broader applications to multilevel and predictive modeling beyond MAIHDA.

Abstract

Social epidemiologists frequently aim to quantify how social, spatial, or organizational contexts shape individual outcomes, an aim commonly addressed through the use of multilevel models. These models readily estimate the magnitude of group-level differences, but it is more difficult to formalize the uncertainty in the relative ordering of predicted group-level outcomes, which is often considered qualitatively in practice. We propose an entropy-based coefficient, grounded in information theory, which quantifies the stability of predicted group-level rankings. This metric, termed the separation statistic , integrates both the magnitude of group-level differences and their statistical uncertainty, providing a principled summary of how well groups are separated in terms of their predicted outcomes. Our motivation is drawn from Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), a widely used approach in social epidemiology for assessing group-level heterogeneity with multilevel models. We show how the separation statistic can be applied to group-level predictions derived from MAIHDA models and is compatible with both Bayesian and frequentist estimation approaches. The metric can be computed globally, across all groups, or locally, within specific subsets of interest. We demonstrate its utility using applied examples from intersectional MAIHDA and provide accompanying code to facilitate its use in future studies. By quantifying the stability of group-level predictions, the separation statistic offers a broadly applicable tool for describing certainty in the relative ordering of outcomes from multilevel models. Importantly, it should be interpreted as a descriptive measure of ranking uncertainty rather than a prescriptive target, with its limitations carefully considered in applied settings. • We propose a method for quantifying the separation between group-level predictions • The method is based on mathematical principles of information theory and entropy • This has immediate applications to MAIHDA, as demonstrated in empirical examples • This also has broader applications to multilevel and predictive models more generally • R and Stata code are provided for researchers to implement this in their analyses

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bashir et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02c2fdce8c8c81e9640467https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119391
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper