PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 13, 2026Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Trade-offs in proton and photon radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas

DPDavid J.A. PalmJPJohn PaulissenRER. Emmah

Key Points

  • The study evaluates the dose-volume benefits of proton therapy versus photon therapy for treating pituitary adenomas.
  • Treatment plans were developed for 15 pituitary adenoma patients using intensity modulated proton therapy and photon therapy.
  • Dose distributions to organs of interest were compared using the Radiation Oncology Collaborative Comparison Group's Performance Scoring System.
  • Adverse event burden was estimated based on dose volumes to critical brain structures.
  • Proton therapy showed significantly lower overall estimated adverse event burden than both photon modalities (median RPSS: 1.09 vs. 1.24; p < 0.005).
  • In the right hippocampus, proton therapy achieved a median D<sub>40 %</sub> of 1.01 Gy, significantly lower than coplanar (4.9 Gy) and non-coplanar (3.2 Gy) photons (p < 0.001).
  • For the left hippocampus, IMPT had a median D<sub>40 %</sub> of 0.7 Gy, also significantly lower than coplanar (5.0 Gy) and non-coplanar (2.7 Gy) photons (p < 0.001).

Abstract

AbstractBackground and Purpose Pituitary Adenomas (PAs) are tumours proximal to sensitive organs of interest (OOIs). These tumours may be well-suited for proton therapy due to the Bragg peak. Few studies have evaluated the potential dose-volume benefits of protons for PAs in the pencil beam scanning era. Materials and Methods Treatment plans for 15 PA patients were made using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), coplanar- and- non-coplanar photon therapy. Dose distributions to OOIs were compared using the Radiation Oncology Collaborative Comparison Group's (ROCOCO) Performance Scoring System (RPSS), which estimates adverse event (AE) burden. Results Proton therapy resulted in significantly lower overall estimated AE burden than both photon modalities (median RPSS: 1.09 vs. 1.24; p 40 % to the hippocampi. For the right hippocampus, median D40 % (EQDGy2) was 1.01 Gy with IMPT, compared with 4.9 Gy for coplanar and 3.2 Gy for non-coplanar photons. Doses with protons and non-coplanar photons were significantly lower than those for coplanar photons (p 40 % of 0.7 Gy, compared with 5.0 Gy for coplanar and 2.7 Gy for non-coplanar photons. Non-coplanar was significantly lower than coplanar (p Conclusions These findings indicate that IMPT can significantly reduce AEs to critical brain structures. Although considerations of cost, accessibility, and clinical validation remain, IMPT may offer a meaningful therapeutic advantage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Palm et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04141c79e20c90b44444d3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100994
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper