PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026European Journal of Radiology0 citationsOpen Access

Additional value of supplemental breast ultrasound in women with a personal history of breast cancer undergoing mammography surveillance

GZGiulia ZanettiENElizabet NikolovaJWJúlia Wéber

Key Points

  • To evaluate the diagnostic value of supplemental breast ultrasound in women with a personal history of breast cancer during mammography surveillance.
  • Retrospective single-center study analyzing data from women with personal history of breast cancer and mammography with supplemental breast ultrasound between 2015 and 2016.
  • Inclusion criteria included various BI-RADS categories with specific follow-up durations and histopathologic confirmations.
  • Performance measures assessed were sensitivity, specificity, and incremental cancer detection rate for both mammography and supplemental breast ultrasound.
  • In 1089 examinations across 992 women, supplemental breast ultrasound identified three additional axillary recurrences but no additional breast cancers.
  • Sensitivity for supplemental breast ultrasound was 100% and specificity was 97.9% across both breast conserving surgery and mastectomy populations.
  • Overall, supplemental breast ultrasound increased the rates of additional biopsies and follow-ups, without improving breast cancer detection.

Abstract

Objectivesto evaluate the diagnostic value of supplemental breast ultrasound (SBU) in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC) undergoing mammography surveillance. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective single-center study analyzed the data of women with PHBC and mammography with SBU between 2015 and 2016.Inclusion criteria were: BI-RADS 1-2 with at least 24 months follow-up, BI-RADS 3 with at least 36 months follow-up, and BI-RADS 4-5 with histopathologic confirmation.Performance measures included sensitivity, specificity and incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) for mammography and SBU, separately. ResultsOf the 1089 examinations in 992 women (mean age 62.9 11.9 years), 75.7% had breastconserving surgery (BCS) and 24.3% mastectomy.SBU did not detect additional cancers in the breast (0.2% in BCS and 1.0% in mastectomy) but identified three additional axillary lymphnode recurrences, (0.2% in BCS and 0.3% in mastectomy).In women with BCS mammography and SBU had sensitivity 75.0%(95%CI: 19.4,99.4) and 100.0%(95%CI: 39.8,100.0),specificity 99.7% (95%CI: 98.1,99.9)and 97.9% (95%CI: 95.7,99.3),respectively.The ICDR for SBU was 3.3 malignancy/1000 examinations.In women with mastectomy, mammography and SBU had sensitivity 75.0%(95%CI: 19.4,99.4) and 100.0%(95%CI: 39.8,100.0),specificity 99.7% (95% CI: 98.1,99.9)and 97.9% (95% CI: 95.7,99.3),respectively.The ICDR for SBU was 3.3 malignancy/1000 examinations.Overall, SBU led to increased rates of additional biopsies and short-term follow-ups. ConclusionCompared with mammography alone, SBU provided added value only for detecting axillary recurrences but not for identifying additional breast cancers.Its use should be balanced against increased rates of biopsy and recall.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zanetti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05659da550a87e60a1df99https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112932
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper