PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

Spatial release from masking in reverberant environments for children with normal hearing and those with bilateral cochlear implants

View Full Paper
ZPZ. Ellen Peng

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how simulated reverberation affects spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing compared to those with cochlear implants.
  • Used auditory virtual reality to simulate reverberation effects on spatial release from masking (SRM).
  • Compared SRM between school-age children with normal hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users implanted during childhood.
  • Findings suggest that reverberation negatively impacts spatial hearing capabilities for both groups.
  • Children with cochlear implants displayed greater difficulty in utilizing spatial separation to improve speech intelligibility compared to children with normal hearing.

Abstract

The current ANSI S12.60 classroom acoustics standard on reverberation was established primarily for good speech perception for school-age children. In classrooms with a lot of ongoing noise, such as background babble, children can benefit from spatial hearing, specifically the ability to gain better intelligibility when the target and the babble talkers are spatially separated. However, while distorting important speech cues, reverberation also distorts important binaural cues, limiting access to spatial hearing for children. In this work, we will examine the impact of simulated reverberation on spatial release from masking (SRM) using auditory virtual reality. SRM is a psychoacoustic measure of the ability to gain speech intelligibility benefits from spatial separation between the target and babble talkers. We will compare SRM under reverberation between school-age children with normal hearing and a group of bilateral cochlear implant users who were implanted during childhood. Findings will provide insights into how the current classroom acoustics standard can support children's spatial hearing. Work supported by NIH R21DC020532.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Z. Ellen Peng (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0566fba550a87e60a1eef4https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0040442
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perceptual consequences of reverberant environments on spatial unmasking2024
  2. 2Spatial Release from Masking with Simulated Electric–Acoustic and Cochlear Implant Speech2026
  3. 3Spatial release from masking with simulated hybrid cochlear implant speech2024
  4. 4Objective and Subjective Measures of Spatial Hearing in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss2024
  5. 5Neural Encoding for Spatial Release from Informational Masking and its Correlation with Behavioral Metrics2024 · 6 citations