PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Efficient deep learning models for oral squamous cell carcinoma classification in histopathological images

View Full Paper
JKJ S Ananda KumarMKM Surendra KumarMJMani Jindal

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning models in classifying histopathological images of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Evaluated four deep learning convolutional neural network models: ResNet50, DenseNet201, EfficientNetB0, and ConvNeXt_Tiny.
  • Performed binary classification of 10,000 histopathological images (benign vs. carcinoma).
  • Analyzed model performance using accuracy and ROC-AUC scores.
  • EfficientNetB0 achieved an accuracy of 97.6% and ROC-AUC of 0.9963.
  • ConvNeXt_Tiny yielded an accuracy of 95.92%.
  • DenseNet201 achieved 86.08% accuracy, while ResNet50 had the lowest at 71.52%.

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of disease classification in digital pathology. Early diagnosis and precise classification of histopathological images are crucial for enabling timely treatment and improving therapeutic outcomes. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most common malignancies in the oral cavity, with manual histopathological examination serving as the gold standard for diagnosis—though it is time-consuming and subject to observer variability. This study investigates the performance of four deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) models—ResNet50 (residual blocks), DenseNet201 (dense connectivity), EfficientNetB0 (compound scaling), and ConvNeXtTiny (transformer-based convolutions) —for binary classification (benign vs. carcinoma) of 10, 000 histopathological images. Among the models, EfficientNetB0 achieved the highest accuracy of 97. 6% and an ROC-AUC score of 0. 9963, demonstrating superior generalization and discriminative power. ConvNeXtTiny followed with an accuracy of 95. 92%, DenseNet201 with 86. 08%, and ResNet50 with the lowest accuracy of 71. 52%. The comparative analysis underscores the advantages of modern CNN architectures over traditional residual networks, supporting the integration of deep learning models into diagnostic frameworks for improved detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567a8a550a87e60a1fd26https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44424-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Deep learning–based automated detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma in histopathological images: a comparative study of five CNN architectures2026
  2. 2Enhancing oral squamous cell carcinoma detection: a novel approach using improved EfficientNet architecture2024 · 48 citations
  3. 3Early Detection and Diagnosis of Oral Cancer Using Deep Neural Network2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Oral squamous cell detection using deep learning2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5EMPOWERING ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA DETECTION WITH DEEP LEARNING: INSIGHTS FROM CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL IMAGES2024