PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

End-of-surgery prediction of postoperative infectious complications from intraoperative vital-sign dynamics.

View Full Paper
TBTobias U. BlatterYWYves WintschKTKaren Triep

Key Points

  • To develop and validate a model predicting postoperative infections using intraoperative vital-sign dynamics.
  • Analyzed intraoperative vital signs such as arterial blood pressure and heart rate in 10,719 surgical procedures.
  • Utilized machine-learning algorithms to create predictive models integrating time-series data.
  • Employed SHAP-based feature attribution for model interpretability.
  • Achieved an AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) for infection prediction immediately post-surgery.
  • Models using intraoperative features outperformed those reliant on preoperative variables alone.
  • Predictions were calibrated across major procedure clusters, enhancing clinical applicability.

Abstract

Infections after surgery remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, yet reliable risk stratification at the end of surgery is limited. Intraoperative vital signs are continuously recorded in modern operating rooms but remain an underexploited source of real-time prognostic information. We developed and validated a machine-learning model integrating intraoperative vital-sign dynamics to predict postoperative infections immediately at the end of surgery. We extracted arterial blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, and end-tidal CO₂ time-series from a clinical data warehouse, transforming these signals into interpretable summary, trend, and distributional descriptors. Using routine data from 10,719 surgical procedures, models incorporating interpretable intraoperative time-series features achieved an AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) for infection prediction at the end of surgery, significantly outperforming models based on preoperative variables alone. Model predictions were calibrated across major procedure clusters and interpretable through SHAP-based feature attribution. Our results demonstrate that intraoperative time-series data encode signatures of cumulative surgical and physiological stress, revealing early and clinically actionable signals of postoperative infection risk and enable an explainable machine-learning framework for perioperative monitoring systems. This explainable approach moves risk assessment from delayed postoperative testing to immediate, digital decision support, ready for integration into perioperative monitoring systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blatter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567bca550a87e60a1fe4dhttps://doi.org/10.48620/97590
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1End-of-surgery prediction of postoperative infectious complications from intraoperative vital-sign dynamics2026
  2. 2Prediction of postoperative infections by strategic data imputation and explainable machine learning2025
  3. 3Prediction of postoperative infections by strategic data imputation and explainable machine learning2024
  4. 4Fast, efficient and accurate prediction of postoperative outcomes using a small set of intraoperative time series2024
  5. 5The Value of Aggregated High-Resolution Intraoperative Data for Predicting Post-Surgical Infectious Complications at Two Independent Sites2019 · 5 citations