PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Australasian Journal of Dermatology0 citations

Efficacy and Safety of IL ‐ 4Rα Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

View Full Paper
AVAna Carolina Putini VieiraEREllen de Freitas RezendeAJAna Carolina Ventura Santana de de Jesus

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-4Rα inhibitors for atopic dermatitis through a systematic analysis of randomized controlled trials.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of nineteen RCTs involving 4465 patients.
  • Evaluated outcomes included EASI-50/75/90, IGA 0/1, and pruritus reduction at week 16.
  • Identified and compared effects of various IL-4Rα inhibitors including dupilumab, stapokibart, and rademikibart.
  • IL-4Rα inhibitors demonstrated sustained efficacy in atopic dermatitis with significant reductions in symptoms.
  • Dupilumab showed durable effects with low heterogeneity and favorable safety.
  • Stapokibart and rademikibart achieved superior outcomes, with OR of 4.94 (95% CI 3.20-7.61) and 4.61 (95% CI 1.68-12.65) respectively, but with higher adverse event rates for rademikibart.

Abstract

statistics. Nineteen RCTs comprising 4465 patients met inclusion criteria. At week 16, IL-4Rα inhibitors showed sustained efficacy across EASI-50/75/90, IGA 0/1 and pruritus reduction. Dupilumab remained the most validated agent, with durable effects, low heterogeneity and favourable safety. Among novel biologics, stapokibart and rademikibart demonstrated the most promising results, achieving superior EASI-90 and ≥ 4-point PP-NRS responses: stapokibart (OR 4.94; 95% CI 3.20-7.61) and rademikibart (OR 4.61; 95% CI 1.68-12.65), though the latter showed higher odds of adverse events. Other agents (MG-K10, GR1802, 611, AK120) provided encouraging but limited data. IL-4Rα inhibitors represent effective and safe therapies for moderate-to-severe AD. Dupilumab remains the reference standard, while stapokibart and rademikibart emerge as promising next-generation options. Further large, long-term, head-to-head RCTs are warranted to confirm their comparative performance. PROSPERO Registration: CRD420251129343.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vieira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05680ea550a87e60a20607https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.70138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper