PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 20260 citations

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors outcomes in good vision eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Fight Retinal Blindness SPAIN Report 4.

View Full Paper
LSLaura Sánchez-VelaHBHelena BrosaRMRubén Martín

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the visual outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in eyes with high baseline visual acuity.
  • Multicentre, real-world, national database study
  • Data collected on demographics, visual acuity, injections, and patient visits
  • Subgroup analysis based on baseline visual acuity into good vision and non-good vision groups
  • Good vision eyes (GVE) had a final visual acuity of 71.0 ± 13.8 at 24 months vs 52.3 ± 23.2 in non-good vision eyes (NGVE), p < 0.001
  • GVE showed a mean visual acuity change of -4.5 (12 months: -2.4, 36 months: -7.8) vs NGVE with +5.0 and +4.0, respectively
  • GVE required a higher number of injections and had a greater percentage of visits with active lesions through 36 months.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes initiating anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment with baseline visual acuity (VA) ≥70 letters. METHODS: Multicentre, real-world, and national database study. Demographics, VA, number of injections, and patient visit data were collected using a validated online tool. Subgroup analysis included 2 nonoverlapping participant groups defined by baseline VA: Good vision eyes (GVE, "70-100 letters") and non-GVE ("0-69 letters") at 12, 24, and 36 months. RESULTS: A total of 3 138 eyes (2 520 patients) were included in the analysis, followed up for 12 (n = 2 426; 77.3%), 24 (n = 1 793; 57.1%), and 36 months (n = 1 167; 37.2%). GVE had significantly better 24-month final VA (71.0 ± 13.8 vs 52.3 ± 23.2; p < 0.001) than NGVE. Mean VA change (letters) at 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up was significantly lower in the GVE -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6), -4.5 (-5.6, -3.5), and -7.8 (-9.4, -6.2) than in NGVE +6.7 (5.8, 7.6), +5.0 (3.8, 6.2), and +4.0 (2.5, 5.5) group, respectively. The number of injections and percentage of visits with active lesions were higher in GVE through 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: The mean VA of GVE tends to drop, but it is still much higher than NGVE eyes at 12, 24, and 36 months. Early detection and prompt treatment are key and should be considered in treatment access policies, regulatory frameworks, and clinical guidelines, as defining a threshold to start treatment may have a clear impact on final visual function, patient autonomy and legal blindness rates in nAMD patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sánchez-Vela et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05680ea550a87e60a206f8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2026.04.001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration2006 · 5,919 citations
  2. 2Quality of Life in Patients With Age-related Macular Degeneration: Impact of the Condition and Benefits of Treatment2005 · 120 citations
  3. 3Associations with visual acuity outcomes after 12 months of treatment in 9401 eyes with neovascular AMD2022 · 6 citations
  4. 4Incidence and baseline clinical characteristics of treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a well-defined region of the UK2013 · 30 citations
  5. 5The Potential Importance of Detection of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration When Visual Acuity Is Relatively Good2017 · 50 citations