PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026SPE Polymers0 citationsOpen Access

Mechanistic Optimization of Pressure Transmission for Defect Mitigation in Thick‐Walled Aerospace‐Grade Polyetherimide

View Full Paper
CTChirag Thummar

Key Points

  • The aim is to optimize processing variables to mitigate voids in thick-walled aerospace-grade polyetherimide components.
  • Investigated the influence of processing variables on void mitigation using industrially constrained experimental design.
  • Performed analysis of variance to assess defect variation based on thermal parameters like cooling time and mold temperature.
  • Identified gate freeze time as a key process indicator through linear regression analysis.
  • Achieved a gate freeze time of 8.0 seconds under optimized conditions, producing no detectable voids (maximum void diameter < 0.1 mm).
  • Reduced scrap rates from 18.7% to 1.1%, significantly cutting manufacturing costs per accepted part.
  • Established a regression-derived threshold of 5.61 seconds corresponding to aerospace specification limits of 0.75 mm.

Abstract

ABSTRACT High‐performance amorphous thermoplastics such as polyetherimide ( PEI ) are widely used in aerospace applications; however, thick‐walled sections are prone to internal void formation due to volumetric shrinkage and premature gate solidification. In this work, the influence of processing variables on void mitigation in thick‐walled PEI components was investigated using an industrially constrained experimental design. Analysis of variance showed that thermal parameters dominated defect variation, with cooling time and mold temperature contributing 50.4% and 30.15%, respectively. Linear regression identified gate freeze time ( GFT ) as a practical process indicator of pressure‐transmission efficiency, exhibiting a strong negative correlation with the maximum void diameter ( r = −0.964, R 2 = 0.930). A regression‐derived threshold of 5.61 s corresponded to the aerospace specification limit of 0.75 mm, and a conservative production target of 6.5 s was recommended based on the 95% prediction interval analysis. Under optimized conditions (160°C mold temperature, 40 s cooling time), the process achieved a GFT of 8.0 s and produced no ultrasonically detectable voids (maximum void diameter < 0.1 mm). Scrap rates decreased from 18.7% to 1.1%, reducing manufacturing cost per accepted part. These findings establish GFT as a practical mechanistic indicator for process‐window development in thick‐walled high‐performance thermoplastics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chirag Thummar (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05684ea550a87e60a20c04https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.70050
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper