PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 13, 2026European Journal of Forest Research0 citationsOpen Access

Competitive disadvantage of Quercus petraea seedlings in mixtures with Fagus sylvatica and Carpinus betulus can be explained by different biomass allocation patterns

TMTobias ModrowPPPatrick PyttelFBFriderike Beyer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Natural regeneration of Quercus petraea is often inferior in height growth compared to shade-tolerant companion species. As a result, frequent removal of competing vegetation is typically required to promote Q. petraea for successful regeneration. Here we examined whether differences in species’ biomass allocation, biomass density, and total leaf area are responsible for inferior competitiveness of Q. petraea. For this purpose, 37 four-year-old Q. petraea seedlings and 15 and 17 seedlings of the shade-tolerant Fagus sylvatica and Carpinus betulus, respectively, were excavated along a radiation gradient within a mixed Q. petraea forest. Solar radiation above each seedling ranged from 1 to 70% of open field conditions. Annual shoot lengths and total heights of F. sylvatica and C. betulus were higher than in Q. petraea across the radiation gradient. Total biomass was comparable among the species at any level of radiation, but aboveground woody mass fraction in Q. petraea (34%) was always significantly lower than in F. sylvatica (47%) and C. betulus (52%), while its root mass fraction was significantly higher at 47% compared to 34% and 26%, respectively. At the same time, Q. petraea had a significantly lower average height-to-root collar diameter ratio (56) than F. sylvatica (71) and C. betulus (105). In contrast, biomass density of Q. petraea roots and shoots was significantly higher than in F. sylvatica and C. betulus. Owing to different biomass allocation patterns between Q. petraea and companion species, there are no light levels at which Q. petraea regeneration does not require control of competition to survive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Modrow et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0661cd7eb468146f4d0a60https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-025-01864-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO 2 , nutrients and water: a quantitative review2000 · 336 citations
  2. 2Effects of altitude on density and biometric properties of hornbeam wood (Carpinus betulus)2019 · 7 citations
  3. 3The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L.1998 · 141 citations
  4. 4Light and competition gradients fail to explain the coexistence of shade-tolerant Fagus sylvatica and shade-intermediate Quercus petraea seedlings2013 · 41 citations
  5. 5COMPETITION BETWEEN SESSILE OAK SEEDLINGS AND COMPETING VEGETATION UNDER A SHELTERWOOD2021 · 10 citations