PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Risk Factors, Not Low-Osmolar Contrast, Predict Acute Kidney Injury Following Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study

KHKyaw Kyaw HoeJHJulear Hobson

Key Points

  • This research evaluates whether low-osmolar contrast, particularly iopromide, is linked to acute kidney injury in CT imaging.
  • Retrospective cohort study involving 1915 patients undergoing CT imaging.
  • Utilized multivariable binary logistic regression and pairwise correlation analysis to identify predictors of acute kidney injury.
  • Examined differences between patients exposed and not exposed to low-osmolar contrast.
  • AKI occurrence was similar between contrast-exposed (10.6%) and non-exposed (8.8%) groups (p=0.188).
  • Identified independent risk factors for CA-AKI: active malignancy (aOR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.54-3.84, p<0.001), pre-existing renal dysfunction (aOR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.27-4.18, p=0.006), and cardiac disease (aOR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.22-3.58, p=0.007).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety of a low-osmolar contrast agent, iopromide (Ultravist, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), currently being used is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate whether iopromide use was associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: ) test, along with pairwise correlation analysis, was applied to find the relationship between contrast exposure and AKI as well as AKI and renal outcomes. To find out the independent predictors of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), a multivariable binary logistic regression model was conducted. RESULTS: Of 1915 participants who underwent CT imaging, 869 (45.4%) were exposed to contrast, while 1046 (54.6%) were not exposed to contrast. No statistically significant difference was found between exposed and non-exposed groups for the development of AKI (10.6% vs. 8.8%; p=0.188). Both groups were found to have lower mean post-procedure sCr compared to pre-procedure sCr (-2.2 and -12.7 µmol/L, respectively). The AKI occurrence was not directly associated with whether patients were exposed to iopromide or not (r=0.03; p=0.178). Noteworthy risk factors identified were active malignancy (aOR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.54-3.84; p<0.001), pre-existing renal dysfunction (aOR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.27-4.18; p=0.006), and cardiac disease (aOR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.22-3.58; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Use of low-osmolar contrast agents for CT imaging was not independently associated with AKI. Our results suggest that contrast-enhanced CT may be considered when clinically indicated without unnecessary delay while acknowledging that individual patient risk assessment remains essential. Greater emphasis should instead be placed on identifying and optimizing certain factors, like active malignancy, pre-existing renal dysfunction, and cardiac diseases, to prevent CA-AKI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b74ce7dec685947aa416https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108615
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper