PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026International Journal of Social Science Studies0 citationsOpen Access

The State That Cannot See Its Own Tools: Algorithmic Opacity and the Limits of Transparency Law in Brazilian Public Administration

MSMayara Cristhina Rodriguero dos SantosASAlexandre Pacheco da SilvaMFMarina Feferbaum

Key Points

  • This article examines the challenges of transparency and accountability in AI use within Brazilian public administration, focusing on the Smart Sampa program.
  • Analyzed the Smart Sampa facial recognition program in São Paulo;
  • Evaluated six regulatory frameworks including EU and Brazilian proposals;
  • Utilized citizen preference research and studies on institutional trust.
  • Identified gaps in transparency mechanisms for high-risk AI;
  • Proposed enhancements to the role of the Judiciary for algorithmic review;
  • Argued that existing laws need amplification rather than new legislation.

Abstract

This article examines the transparency and accountability challenges raised by the use of AI systems in Brazilian public administration, using the Smart Sampa facial recognition program in the city of São Paulo as a central case study. Drawing on the work of Lessig (1999) and Crootof Meijer Wenzelburger et al., 2024), the article argues that passive transparency mechanisms, whether algorithm registers, explanation rights, or formal access to information channels, cannot in themselves generate the accountability needed to govern high-risk AI systems in Brazilian public security contexts. The article proposes an institutional framework requiring pre-deployment review by a specialized algorithmic gatekeeper within the Judiciary, mandatory multi-level disclosure obligations, administrative appeals for affected individuals, and formal override of trade secrecy claims against gatekeeper access requests. The proposals do not require new primary legislation but the amplification of roles and powers already available in the Brazilian legal system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b74ce7dec685947aa47dhttps://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v14i2.8814
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper