PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Marine Pollution Bulletin0 citationsOpen Access

Macrolitter accumulation in tidal marsh wrack deposits in a large estuary

View Full Paper
OGOstin Garcés-OrdóñezMCMiquel CanalsGNGenevieve L. Noyce

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the abundance, composition, and sources of anthropogenic macrolitter in marsh wrack deposits.
  • Assessment of macrolitter at 27 tidal-marsh sites in the Chesapeake Bay estuary
  • Analysis of relationships between macrolitter presence and urban pressure or marsh conditions
  • Data collection on composition, buoyancy, and sources of macrolitter
  • Anthropogenic macrolitter abundance ranged from 56 to 4481 items km −1 and mass from 0.9 to 254 kg km −1
  • 93.5% of macrolitter was positively buoyant, primarily plastic (90%), with 74.5% being 2–25 cm in size
  • Over 50% of macrolitter originated from land-based sources, indicating significant pollution from poor waste management

Abstract

Wrack refers to debris deposited along the upper intertidal zone by waves and tides. In the past, wrack consisted mainly of natural debris, but modern wrack includes anthropogenic macrolitter (AML). When AML is abundant, wracks become pollution hotspots that threaten ecosystem functioning. Here, we assess AML abundance, composition, and sources in wrack deposits from 27 tidal-marsh sites in the Chesapeake Bay estuary (USA) and examine relationships with surrounding urban pressure and marsh conditions. Marsh wrack deposits in the estuary are dominated by wood, Phragmites , and marine macrophyte debris. AML abundance and mass range from 56 to 4481 items km −1 and 0.9 to 254 kg km −1 of wrack, with highest values in the inner estuary. Both variables decrease with increasing distance from main population centers. Marshes with higher vegetation density index also have high AML pollution. Most AML (93.5%) is positively buoyant, predominantly made of plastic (90%), and small (2–25 cm: 74.5%). Items are mainly plastic bottles and fragments, with a lifetime of 10 years-old) dominate the inner estuary, whereas newer bottles (60% resulting from poor waste management. Marsh wrack deposits act as important accumulation zones for urban-derived AML, with high potential ecosystem impacts. Therefore, the inner estuary and its wrack deposits must be given priority for further research on AML transport, deposition, and carbon-related effects, and mitigation actions. • Buoyant anthropogenic macrolitter (AML) is abundant in marsh wrack deposits across all estuary. • AML accumulation is highest in marsh wrack deposits of the inner estuary. • Urban proximity and vegetation density enhance AML pollution in wrack deposits. • Wrack deposits act as sentinel indicators of AML pollution hotspots in tidal marshes. • The inner estuary and wrack deposits should be prioritized for AML research and mitigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Garcés-Ordóñez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b7a1e7dec685947aa55chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.119848
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Plastic litter is a part of the carbon cycle in an urban river: Microplastic and macroplastic accumulate with organic matter in floating debris rafts2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Tidal effects on estuarine circulation and outflow plume in the Chesapeake Bay2006 · 134 citations
  3. 3Using nitrogen and oxygen isotopes to locate pollution from non-point sources in the Chesapeake Bay2023 · 1 citations
  4. 4Decomposition and nutrient dynamics in a Spartina alterniflora marsh of the Bahia Blanca estuary, Argentina2012 · 12 citations
  5. 5Marine anthropogenic litter on British beaches: A 10-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data2016 · 313 citations