PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Gynecologic Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Longitudinal dynamics of post-diagnosis frailty among older women with ovarian cancer

MPMinh Đức Anh PhùngLBL. E. BarroilhetNBNeil Binkley

Key Points

  • This study aims to characterize post-diagnosis frailty and its association with overall survival among older women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.
  • Included 24,725 women aged 65+ diagnosed with ovarian cancer from SEER-Medicare.
  • Quantified frailty at diagnosis and 1-3 years post-diagnosis using a validated claims-based index.
  • Used a Cox proportional hazards model to assess associations between frailty and survival.
  • Frailty distribution at diagnosis was 7.1% non-frail, 71% pre-frail, 18% mildly frail, 3.4% moderately frail, and 0.9% severely frail.
  • Current frailty was strongly associated with survival: HRs =2.26, 2.77, 3.70 at 1, 2, and 3 years post-diagnosis (all p-values<0.001).
  • Frailty at diagnosis did not predict survival after adjusting for current frailty (HRs for severely frail versus non-frail were not significant).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Leading oncology societies recommend assessing pre-treatment frailty to guide care for older adults with cancer. However, frailty may change post-diagnosis. This study characterized post-diagnosis frailty and its association with overall survival among older women with ovarian cancer. METHODS: We included 24,725 women aged 65+ diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2019 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare. Frailty was quantified at diagnosis and 1-3 years post-diagnosis using a validated claims-based index. We compared patients' frailty at the beginning and end of each year. At 1, 2, and 3 years post-diagnosis, we fit a Cox proportional hazards model including frailty at diagnosis and current frailty to assess associations with survival. RESULTS: Frailty distribution at diagnosis was: 7.1% non-frail, 71% pre-frail, 18% mildly frail, 3.4% moderately frail, and 0.9% severely frail. During year 1, 38% of women maintained frailty status, 4% improved, 26% worsened, and 32% died. In years 2-3, some women remained stable while others improved or worsened. There were 21,309 deaths during a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range 7-58). Frailty at diagnosis was not associated with survival after adjusting for current frailty (hazard ratios HRs for severely frail versus non-frail =0.98, 1.00, 0.76 at 1, 2, 3 years, respectively, all p-values>0.20). Current frailty was strongly associated with survival, and the association increased over time (HRs =2.26, 2.77, 3.70, respectively; all p-values<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Post-diagnosis frailty is dynamic. Current frailty has a stronger association with overall survival compared to frailty at diagnosis. Repeated frailty assessments should be incorporated into clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Phùng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b7a1e7dec685947aa573https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.04.019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper