PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon0 citations

Eleven-Year Experience and Early Outcomes of Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis

CGChristopher GaisendreesLDllija DjordjevicGSGeor Schlachtenberger

Key Result

The provided text contains only the editorial board and publication information for the journal, with no clinical data or study results available for extraction.

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate early outcomes and operative strategies of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in a cohort of patients.
  • Retrospective single-center cohort study of 47 patients
  • Assessments included perioperative characteristics and early outcomes such as mortality and morbidity
  • Operative strategies included median sternotomy and beating-heart techniques
  • 30-day all-cause mortality was 6% (n = 3)
  • Major complications included sepsis in 13% (n = 6) and renal failure in 8.5% (n = 4)
  • Mean ICU stay was 3.7 ± 4.5 days and total hospital stay was 11 ± 6.7 days

Structured PICO

What are the early outcomes and perioperative risks of surgical pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis?

P
Population
47 consecutive patients with constrictive pericarditis, mean age 58 ± 14 years, 64% male. 65% presented with NYHA functional class III to IV, mean EuroSCORE II 8.5 ± 2.3, and mean STS score 9.4 ± 2.3.
I
Intervention
Surgical pericardiectomy (median sternotomy in 94%, radical pericardiectomy in 64%, beating-heart strategy without cardiopulmonary bypass in 79%, cardiopulmonary bypass in 21%)
O
Outcome
Early outcomes including 30-day mortality, postoperative morbidity, and length of stayhard clinical

Surgical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis can be performed with acceptable early mortality (6%) even in a high-risk population.

Abstract

Abstract Constrictive pericarditis represents the end stage of chronic pericardial inflammation and is characterized by impaired diastolic filling due to pericardial fibrosis and/or calcification, leading to progressive right-sided heart failure. Pericardiectomy remains the definitive treatment, yet perioperative risk remains substantial in patients with advanced disease. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of 47 consecutive patients undergoing surgical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis between January 2010 and December 2021. Perioperative characteristics, operative strategy, and early outcomes, including 30-day mortality, postoperative morbidity, and length of stay, were assessed. Mean age was 58 ± 14 years, and 64% of patients were male (n = 30). In the study 65% of patients presented with NYHA functional class III to IV, and operative risk was elevated, with a mean EuroSCORE II of 8.5 ± 2.3 and a mean STS score of 9.4 ± 2.3. Median sternotomy was used in 94% of patients (n = 44), radical pericardiectomy in 64% (n = 30), and a beating-heart strategy without cardiopulmonary bypass in 79% (n = 37), whereas cardiopulmonary bypass was required in 21% (n = 10). We found 30-day all-cause mortality was 6% (n = 3). Major postoperative complications included sepsis in 13% (n = 6) and renal failure requiring dialysis in 8.5% (n = 4). Mean ICU stay was 3.7 ± 4.5 days, and mean total hospital stay was 11 ± 6.7 days. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis can be performed with acceptable early mortality and morbidity even in a high-risk population. In experienced centers, an individualized surgical strategy prioritizing extensive pericardial resection with selective use of cardiopulmonary bypass appears feasible for the management of advanced disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gaisendrees et al. (2026) studied Constrictive Pericarditis. Pericardiectomy was evaluated. The provided text contains only the editorial board and publication information for the journal, with no clinical data or study results available for extraction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b83de7dec685947aab3bhttps://doi.org/10.1055/a-2864-0224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper