PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Journal of Elastomers & Plastics0 citations

Comparative analysis and optimization of nanoalumina, nanosilica, and nanozirconia reinforcements in 3D-printed PLA composites

View Full Paper
JKJanmejay KumarSRSonu RajakSKShiv Ranjan Kumar

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate and optimize the performance of PLA composites reinforced with nano-fillers.
  • Investigated seven PLA composite formulations with 0, 3, and 6% weight fractions of nanoalumina, nanosilica, and nanozirconia
  • Employed the Preference Selection Index method for multi-criteria decision-making
  • Evaluated physical, mechanical properties, and wear behavior
  • 3 wt.-% nanoalumina resulted in increases of up to 29% in compressive strength
  • 3 wt.-% nanosilica enhanced flexural strength by 27%
  • 3 wt.-% nanozirconia identified as the most effective reinforcement overall

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanical and tribological performance of seven different PLA-based composite formulations reinforced with nanoalumina, nanosilica, and nanozirconia at weight fractions of 0, 3, and 6%. A multi-criteria decision-making approach, namely the Preference Selection Index (PSI) method, was employed to evaluate and compare the relative effectiveness of the reinforcements and to identify the optimum nano-filler. The evaluated performance attributes included physical properties (void content and water absorption), mechanical properties (hardness, compressive strength, and flexural strength), and wear behavior. The results indicate that the incorporation of 3 wt.-% nanoalumina led to increases of 18%, 29%, 9%, 3.3%, 3.6%, and 11.7% in void content, water absorption, hardness, compressive strength, flexural strength, and impact strength respectively. Similarly, the addition of 3 wt.-% nanosilica resulted in increases of 43%, 5.8%, 27%, 5%, 5.4% and 23%, while 3 wt.-% nanozirconia enhanced these properties by 7.8%, 14%, 13%, 8.3%, 7.2%, and 41%, respectively. Based on the PSI optimization considering all evaluated attributes, nanozirconia was identified as the most effective reinforcement, followed by nanoalumina and nanosilica.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b83de7dec685947aacd7https://doi.org/10.1177/00952443261451503
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper