PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Clinical Hypertension0 citationsOpen Access

Recent update on renal denervation: where do we stand now?

JSJonghu ShinYYYoung-Won Yoon

Key Result

Renal denervation provides modest but consistent reductions in systolic blood pressure compared with sham procedures, with sustained effects up to 3 years and no late-emerging safety concerns.

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the current state of renal denervation as a treatment for hypertension, examining its effectiveness and safety.
  • Summarizes contemporary clinical trial evidence pertaining to renal denervation for hypertension.
  • Reviews long-term follow-up data and meta-analyses examining blood pressure reductions.
  • Discusses current international guidelines and safety considerations related to renal denervation.
  • Recent trials indicate modest reductions in blood pressure with renal denervation, supported by long-term data up to 3 years.
  • Meta-analyses show consistent systolic blood pressure reductions when compared to sham procedures.
  • Renal denervation is recommended as an adjunctive therapy for select patients with resistant hypertension.

Structured PICO

Does renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension?

P
Population
Patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension
I
Intervention
Renal denervation (RDN) using radiofrequency, ultrasound, or alcohol-mediated approaches
C
Comparator
Sham procedure
O
Outcome
Reduction in office and ambulatory systolic blood pressuresurrogate

Renal denervation is a safe, adjunctive therapy that provides modest but consistent blood pressure reductions in selected patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension, though evidence for hard cardiovascular outcomes is still lacking.

Limitations

  • The magnitude of BP reduction is modest
  • Treatment response is heterogeneous
  • Definitive evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefit is lacking
  • The magnitude of BP reduction achieved with RDN is modest
  • Evidence for RDN is largely confined to BP endpoints without definitive evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefit
  • Variability in treatment response remains a key challenge
  • Interpretation of trial results is complicated by changes in medication adherence and background antihypertensive therapy during follow-up
  • Current RDN techniques lack a universally accepted intra-procedural indicator of denervation adequacy

Abstract

Renal denervation (RDN) has re-emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy for hypertension following advances in device technology, trial design, and patient selection.Early enthusiasm for RDN declined after neutral findings from initial sham-controlled trials; however, subsequent randomized studies have consistently demonstrated modest but significant reductions in blood pressure (BP) across a range of clinical settings.Contemporary shamcontrolled trials using radiofrequency-, ultrasound-, and alcohol-mediated approaches have shown that RDN lowers office and ambulatory BP both in the presence and absence of background antihypertensive therapy.Long-term follow-up data extending up to 3 years suggest that BP-lowering effects can be sustained, with no consistent signal of late-emerging safety concerns.Recent meta-analyses further support these findings, reporting modest but consistent reductions in systolic BP compared with sham procedures.Despite these advances, several limitations remain.The magnitude of BP reduction is modest, treatment response is heterogeneous, and definitive evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefit is lacking.Current international guidelines therefore position RDN as an adjunctive, rather than replacement, therapy for carefully selected patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension.This review summarizes the mechanistic rationale, key clinical trial evidence, long-term durability, safety considerations, and current guideline recommendations for RDN, and discusses future directions to better define its role in hypertension management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shin et al. (2026) conducted a review in Hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) vs. Sham procedures was evaluated on Blood pressure reduction. Renal denervation provides modest but consistent reductions in systolic blood pressure compared with sham procedures, with sustained effects up to 3 years and no late-emerging safety concerns.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8dfe7dec685947ab544https://doi.org/10.5646/ch.2026.32.e26
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper