PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Australian Energy Producers journal.0 citations

The domestic-export tug of war: future of Curtis Island LNG

View Full Paper
KBKrishan Pal BirdaKRKaushal RameshSCSiddhant Chadha

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the potential futures of LNG exports from Curtis Island amidst domestic and export pressures.
  • Explored four future scenarios for LNG exports: Indecisive, Orderly Transition, Domestic First, and Abundance.
  • Analyzed the trade-offs involved in stabilizing prices versus maximizing export revenues.
  • Assessed the economic implications of each scenario for domestic consumers and the broader market.
  • The Orderly Transition scenario offers a balanced outcome, reducing exports to stabilize domestic prices without severe economic impact.
  • The Domestic First scenario could alleviate short-term consumer pressure but risks over A$1 billion annually in lost benefits.
  • Historically low gas prices are unlikely across all scenarios, emphasizing the need for innovative policies and infrastructure investment.

Abstract

The Australian government’s review of East Coast gas policy comes at a pivotal moment, as the region faces tightening supply, volatile prices and rising competition between domestic needs and export commitments. This paper explores the extremes of what is possible in the East Coast gas market through four scenarios for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from Curtis Island in Queensland, which alone represents around 70% of market demand. The scenarios – Indecisive, Orderly Transition, Domestic First and Abundance – illustrate alternative pathways for balancing supply, exports and affordability. Each scenario demonstrates difficult trade-offs: stabilising prices often comes at the expense of export revenues, while prioritising exports can undermine domestic supply security. Among these, the Orderly Transition scenario presents the most balanced outcome, with a phased reduction in LNG exports helping to moderate domestic prices without triggering severe economic dislocation. However, achieving this scenario would require unprecedented coordination among policymakers, producers and investors, and may ironically be the most challenging to implement. In contrast, the Domestic First scenario could deliver short-term relief for consumers but at an estimated economic cost of over A1 billion annually in lost royalties, investment and regional activity. The analysis underscores that a return to historically low gas prices is unlikely under any scenario. Instead, a decisive and forward-looking policy that incentivises the development of new supply sources and infrastructure investment will be crucial in securing affordable and reliable domestic gas in the years ahead.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Birda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8dfe7dec685947ab57ehttps://doi.org/10.1071/ep25205
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Session 21. Oral Presentation for: The domestic-export tug of war: future of Curtis Island LNG2026
  2. 2Goldilocks dilemma: lower cost, more supply, reduced emissions, and reliable trading partner. What is the outlook for Australia getting the gas balance just right?2024
  3. 3East coast LNG imports: absurd or inevitable?2026
  4. 4An uneasy truce: a post-intervention gas market in Eastern Australia2024
  5. 5Session 14. Oral Presentation for: Goldilocks dilemma: lower cost, more supply, reduced emissions, and reliable trading partner. What is the outlook for Australia getting the gas balance just right?2024