PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Environment and Planning D Society and Space0 citations

Archipelagic technonatures: The urbanisation of the ‘global biodiversity hotspot’

View Full Paper
SMSimon MarvinJRJONATHAN RUTHERFORD

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop the concept of archipelagic technonatures to understand how urban infrastructures impact the geographies of global conservation.
  • Analysis of climate-controlled biomes in Paris and Zurich that simulate Madagascar's rainforest.
  • Application of archipelagic thinking to extend insights from urban political ecology and infrastructure studies.
  • Examination of how species, climates, and conservation expertise circulate through these biomes.
  • These biomes render climate programmable as an object of governance.
  • The interventions expose and reproduce North–South asymmetries in conservation efforts.
  • They create experimental spaces where ecological reconstruction techniques can be tested.

Abstract

This paper develops the concept of archipelagic technonatures to analyse how urban infrastructures are reshaping the geographies of global conservation. We focus on climate-controlled biomes in Paris and Zurich that simulate Madagascar's rainforest ecosystems. These enclosed environments function as infrastructural nodes in a trans-situ regime where endangered ecologies are displaced, reconstructed and managed across geographically discontinuous but functionally integrated sites. By tracing how species, climates and conservation expertise settle in and circulate through these biomes, we show how climate itself is rendered programmable as an object of governance. Using archipelagic thinking to extend insights from urban political ecology and infrastructure studies, we argue that these biomes constitute a postcolonial material topology of conservation. They transform endangered life into curated, atmospheric and data-generating forms that sustain urban authority over planetary ecologies while reproducing North–South asymmetries. Yet they also create experimental ‘truth spots’ where ecological reconstruction techniques can be tested and circulated. The concept of archipelagic technonatures foregrounds this ambivalence: infrastructures that both expose inequalities of displacement and open possibilities for more relational modes of conservation across unsettled, multi-sited landscapes. In doing so, the paper contributes to debates on ecological urbanisation, climate governance and the technopolitics of nature in the Anthropocene.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marvin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8dfe7dec685947ab6c1https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758261450485
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Keeping time with digital technologies: From real-time environments to forest futurisms2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Climate‐controlled conservation: Remaking ‘the botanical metropolis of the world’2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Topological twists2011 · 425 citations
  4. 4Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces2002 · 1,926 citations
  5. 5Understanding air-conditioned lives: qualitative insights from Doha2022 · 15 citations