PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Element-to-mineral-properties conversion (EMPC) via MARSpline for 3D geometallurgical modeling of the Koashva Apatite-Nepheline Deposit, Kola Peninsula, Russia

AKA. O. KalashnikovAGA. S. GanyushkinaGNG. O. Nagovitsyn

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a machine learning framework that converts geochemical assays into predictive mineralogical properties.
  • Utilized the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARSpline) method for predictive modeling.
  • Focused on the Koashva apatite-nepheline deposit in Kola Peninsula, Russia.
  • Models are constructed using bulk-rock composition data including P2O5, Al2O3, and TiO2.
  • Models yield reliable predictions with R values typically > 0.85 for major minerals and > 0.6 for key trace elements in apatite.
  • Successfully constructed 3D block models detailing mineral composition and ore mineral chemistry.
  • Identified zones of refractory ore and areas with low-grade apatite concentrate, enhancing ore processing strategies.

Abstract

Abstract Efficient processing of complex ores is often hampered by an incomplete understanding of the spatial distribution of critical mineralogical properties. Here, we introduce a machine learning-based framework that addresses this gap. Using the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARSpline) method, we develop predictive models for converting standard geochemical assays into mineralogical properties – a process we term Element-to-Mineral-Properties Conversion (EMPC). Applied to the Koashva apatite-nepheline deposit (Kola Peninsula, Russia), our approach yields reliable predictions (r typically > 0.85 for major minerals and > 0.6 for key trace elements in apatite) for mineral composition and ore mineral chemistry using only bulk-rock P 2 O 5 , Al 2 O 3 , and TiO 2 . These predictions enable the construction of the first 3D block models of mineral composition and mineral chemistry for this deposit. By integrating these models with conditional geometallurgical criteria, we identify and spatially delineate zones of refractory ore (containing > 6 vol% pyroxenes and > 1 vol% “liebenerite”) and areas yielding low-grade apatite concentrate (where apatite contains > 6.5 wt% SrO + REE 2 O 3 ). This work establishes a generalizable, data-driven pathway for geometallurgical modeling, transforming historical exploration data into a critical decision-making tool for optimizing mine planning and mitigating processing challenges.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kalashnikov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8f8e7dec685947ab7fehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52558-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1RocMLMs: Predicting Rock Properties through Machine Learning Models2024
  2. 2Leveraging Domain Expertise in Machine Learning for Critical Metal Prospecting in the Oslo Rift: A Case Study for Fe-Ti-P-Rare Earth Element Mineralization2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Development of a machine learning model to classify mineral deposits using sphalerite chemistry and mineral assemblages2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Data‐Driven Insights into Rare Earth Mineralization: Machine Learning Applications Using Functional Material Synthesis Data2025
  5. 5Primary Controlling Factors of Apatite Trace Element Composition and Implications for Exploration in Orogenic Gold Deposits2024 · 6 citations