PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 20260 citations

Clinical and Genetic Characterization of Constitutional MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation: Implications for Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis.

View Full Paper
MBMegan F H BishopNKNisha KanwarLSLauren E. Schefter

Key Points

  • To characterize the clinical and genetic aspects of constitutional MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (CMPH) in individuals with Lynch syndrome.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis on 422 individuals undergoing CMPH testing
  • Utilized promoter sequencing to identify germline variants
  • Applied long-read sequencing to assess MLH1 promoter methylation
  • CMPH was identified in 15.6% of participants, with 63 showing features of Lynch syndrome
  • Detected colorectal, endometrial, breast, and sebaceous neoplasms as associated cancers
  • Identified eight unique germline variants, including three novel variants with mutant allele-specific methylation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Constitutional MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (CMPH) is a relatively rare cause of Lynch syndrome. While most cases appear sporadic, some result from secondary epimutations, mainly caused by germline variants in the MLH1 promoter region. This study describes the clinical phenotype and genetic etiology of CMPH in the largest clinical cohort to date. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 422 individuals who underwent clinical CMPH testing. Promoter sequencing was used to identify the underlying variants. Long-read sequencing further characterized MLH1 promoter methylation. RESULTS: CMPH was identified in 15.6% of study cohort participants. Of these, 63 exhibited clinical features consistent with Lynch syndrome. The most common associated cancers were colorectal, followed by endometrial, breast, and sebaceous neoplasms. Mendelian inheritance of CMPH was observed in five families in the study cohort, indicating secondary epimutations. Promoter sequencing identified eight unique germline variants, including three novel variants. Methylation analysis by long-read sequencing demonstrated mutant allele-specific promoter methylation for these variants. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide the most comprehensive review of the clinical phenotype associated with CMPH and highlight the significant contribution of promoter variants to its etiology. These results underscore the need to include constitutional MLH1 promoter methylation assessment for Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bishop et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b928e7dec685947abb64https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2026.102594
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper