Background Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease caused by kinetoplastid parasites. If left untreated, VL has a case fatality >90%, making treatment essential for patient survival. Existing therapies have several limitations that impact treatment outcomes, including toxicity, requirement for parenteral administration, long treatment duration, and development of parasite resistance, driving the need for newer therapies. This Phase 1 first-time-in-human study evaluated the tolerability, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of GSK3494245, a novel highly selective Leishmania kinetoplastid proteasome inhibitor. Methodology This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study evaluating the oral administration of GSK3494245 in healthy participants aged 18 to ≤55 years (NCT04504435). The study was conducted at a single center in the United Kingdom between October 2020 and January 2024. Findings GSK3494245 had an acceptable safety profile following administration of single doses of up to 240 mg in healthy male participants. All adverse events (AEs) were considered resolved or recovered, with most AEs being of mild or moderate severity. One serious AE of mild tachycardia was reported. The increase in exposure was slightly more than dose-proportional and approximately proportional under fasted and fed conditions, respectively. The median time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (C max ) ranged from 0.50 to 1.79 hours, and the geometric mean of the elimination half-life ranged from 1.04 to 2.27 hours. Two participants met the C max stopping criterion. Conclusion GSK3494245 showed an acceptable safety profile over the dose range studied. However, based on its observed PK profile, GSK3494245 is unlikely to achieve the effective dose while ensuring safe exposure within the once- or twice-daily monotherapy target product profile recommended by the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative. Clinical Trial Registration NCT Number ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT04504435 EudraCT, CTIS : 2019-004492-39
Moodley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: