PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026SPE Polymers0 citationsOpen Access

Simplified Movement Model to Predict the Thickness Distribution of Products Made by Robomould®

View Full Paper
JVJarne VanherckMGMathijs GorisJPJohan Potargent

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a simple model to predict thickness distribution in products from the Robomould system.
  • Proposed a computationally inexpensive movement model that estimates thickness distribution based on product geometry and movement parameters.
  • Used a volumetric mesh to simulate powder distribution without considering thermal and dynamic effects.
  • Validated the model with experimental data focusing on an 82 L axisymmetric liner.
  • Model shows strong predictive value for thickness estimation.
  • Reduced reliance on trial and error during process set-up, leading to significant time savings.
  • Experimental validation confirms the robustness of the model in predicting layer thickness.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Robotic rotational molding represents a major advancement over conventional techniques by integrating automation, electric heating, and advanced cooling. This process enables cost‐effective production of stress‐free hollow polymer parts with improved quality. A key development is the Robomould system, which uses a robotic arm to control mold movement and electrically heated molds instead of a traditional oven, allowing for superior control over the layer‐thickness distribution. Although the Robomould concept targets a wide range of product geometries, the experimental validation in this work focuses on a single axisymmetric 82 L liner without internal features. Typically, a rock‐and‐roll movement is applied, but current practice still relies on trial and error to define suitable movement and heating parameters, often causing long set‐up phases. To address this, a simple and computationally inexpensive movement model is proposed to estimate thickness distribution for given parameters. The model considers only product geometry and movement, neglecting thermal effects and dynamic powder effects. A volumetric mesh of the product is used to simulate powder distribution, and the powder–mold contact time of each element is translated into local thickness distribution estimation. Despite its simplicity, experimental validation demonstrates strong predictive value, supporting faster process set‐up by reducing reliance on trial and error.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vanherck et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b971e7dec685947ac24ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.70048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper