PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Journal of Population Economics0 citationsOpen Access

Early-term abortion bans and sex selection after Dobbs v Jackson

XBXin BrownWJWilliam Jergins

Key Points

  • This study examines the impact of early-term abortion bans on sex ratios at birth among CKI immigrants.
  • Analyzed sex ratios at birth post-Dobbs v Jackson decision.
  • Utilized difference-in-differences and triple differences methodologies.
  • Focused on first-generation Chinese, Korean, and Indian immigrant populations.
  • Observed a statistically significant increase in the sex ratio at birth among first-parity children.
  • Estimated 139 missing first-born girls in 2023 due to ETA bans.
  • Findings indicate a shift in sex-selective behavior to earlier births among immigrant CKI women.

Abstract

Abstract Following the 2022 US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v Jackson, many states adopted early-term abortion (ETA) bans that prohibit abortions before the age of viability and often before sex determination is technologically feasible. We analyze the effect of ETA bans on the sex ratio at birth among first-generation Chinese, Korean, and Indian (CKI) immigrants using difference-in-differences and triple differences methodologies. While our estimates across higher parity children sometimes indicate a decrease in the sex ratio at birth, they are also generally small and statistically insignificant, which is consistent with continued access to sex selection under ETA bans. In contrast, we find that ETA bans are associated with a large and statistically significant increase in the sex ratio at birth among first-parity children to immigrant CKI women. As elevated sex ratios have not been previously documented on first-parity children, this may indicate that ETA bans shift sex-selective behavior to earlier parities by placing additional emphasis on having a boy now, before any further restrictions on abortions occur. Our estimates suggest that ETA bans caused 139 missing, first-born girls in 2023 alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brown et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b971e7dec685947ac262https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-026-01174-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Tubal Sterilization Rates by State Abortion Laws After the Dobbs Decision2024 · 26 citations
  2. 2Difference-in-Differences Estimators of Intertemporal Treatment Effects2024 · 224 citations
  3. 3Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects2020 · 4,929 citations
  4. 4The Medicaid Notch, Labor Supply, and Welfare Participation: Evidence from Eligibility Expansions1995 · 338 citations
  5. 5Noninvasive Fetal Sex Determination Using Cell-Free Fetal DNA2011 · 245 citations