PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence of Adverse Effects Among Prostate Cancer Patients Following Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Combined Therapy in North Florida

NFNicole FatovicJVJuan VarelaIGItamar Gal

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze the prevalence of post-treatment side effects following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or combined treatment.
  • Retrospective analysis using UF Health Integrated Data Repository and bioinformatics database.
  • Inclusion of males over 35 diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent RALP, EBRT, or RALP followed by EBRT.
  • Statistical analyses performed using SPSS and multiple independent chi-square tests.
  • Among 17729 prostate cancer patients, 6.48% had RALP, 7.89% had EBRT, and 0.81% had combined RALP followed by EBRT.
  • Common side effects included stress incontinence (60.10%) and erectile dysfunction (49.39%) after RALP, and erectile dysfunction (11.22%) and gross hematuria (8.43%) after EBRT.
  • Significantly increased complications like gross hematuria and bladder cancer were linked to EBRT, while stress incontinence and erectile dysfunction were more common with RALP.

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are two widely recognized clinical standards for treating localized prostate cancer (PCa). This study aims to investigate the prevalence of various post-treatment side effects after RALP, EBRT, and the combination of RALP followed by EBRT. Methods: This retrospective study utilized a large-scale bioinformatics database through the UF Health Integrated Data Repository, Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2 1.7.12a PROD). Males over the age of 35 with PCa who underwent RALP, EBRT, or RALP followed by EBRT were identified. Participants who received other treatments for PCa were excluded. International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9, ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients with PCa and post-treatment side effects, while CPT codes were used to isolate those who underwent RALP, EBRT, or RALP followed by EBRT. Patients diagnosed with a given complication before receiving treatment were excluded from the analysis. SPSS was used for all statistical analyses, which consisted of multiple independent chi-square tests. Percentages for each postoperative complication were calculated using the total number of participants who received each treatment. Results: A total of 2329576 patients were identified from June 2011 to December 2024. Of these, 752491 were males over 35 years old. Among 17729 patients with PCa, 1148 (6.48%) received RALP, 1399 (7.89%) underwent EBRT, and 144 (0.81%) underwent RALP followed by EBRT. The most common side effects in men who underwent RALP were stress incontinence, 690 (60.10%); erectile dysfunction, 567 (49.39%); and gross hematuria, 63 (5.49%). The most common side effects in men who underwent EBRT were erectile dysfunction, 157 (11.22%); gross hematuria, 118 (8.43%); and pelvic pain, 67 (4.79%). The most common side effects in men who underwent RALP followed by EBRT were erectile dysfunction, 142 (98.61%); stress incontinence, 22 (15.28%); and gross hematuria, 21 (14.58%). Gross hematuria, bladder cancer, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation were significantly more likely in patients who underwent EBRT. Stress incontinence and erectile dysfunction were significantly more common in patients who underwent RALP. Conclusion: Each treatment modality differs in its postoperative complication profile. Further investigation of these findings is needed to better assess treatment risks and guide physician decision-making for optimal patient outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fatovic et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b971e7dec685947ac286https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108781
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The comparison of post-treatment quality of life after at least two years of follow-up (≥ 24 months) between robotic radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy for intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer2026
  2. 2Management outcomes of localized low-risk prostate cancer: A population-based study.2024
  3. 3Delineating the Long-Term Incidence of Urethral Complications After Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Population-Based Analysis2026
  4. 4Comparative Economic Evaluation of Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation, and Ablative Techniques in the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer2025
  5. 5Real-World Economic Outcomes of Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiation Therapy or Radical Prostatectomy2026