Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent a promising technology for restoring lower limb motor functions and gait after stroke. The application of BCIs in this field is supported by a limited number of studies. The objective of the review was to systematically and critically evaluate the current evidence on the BCIs use for lower limb function rehabilitation in stroke patients. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria were as follows: studies involving adult patients with post-stroke hemiparesis; implementation of non-invasive BCIs specifically targeting lower limb rehabilitation; detailed reporting of training protocols. Quality assessment was conducted using the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools. Twenty-two studies were included in the analysis with the following results. Electroencephalography-based BCIs integrated with functional electrical stimulation of muscles (EEG-BCI-FES) represent the most extensively investigated technology in this field, with efficacy and safety demonstrated in three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-RCT. BCI systems integrated with mechanical devices have been less studied, with evidence from two RCTs, while systems with only visual feedback have also been evaluated in two RCTs. For BCIs with exoskeletons, only technical feasibility has been demonstrated. Further research is needed to optimize training protocols and study long-term effects of using BCI for rehabilitation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Olesya Mokienko
Maria Zisman
Pavel Bobrov
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Central Michigan University
Center for Neurosciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mokienko et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080985a487c87a6a40b613 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000002943
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: