PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Digital Health0 citationsOpen Access

Tracking subjective symptom improvement from patient narratives in mobile health: An observational natural language processing study

View Full Paper
IAIsaac Owusu AsanteENEmmanuel NorbiMAMuhammad Ali

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess whether linguistic features in Chinese mHealth reviews can indicate patient satisfaction and perceived symptom improvement.
  • Analyzed 6,362 reviews from the WeDoctor mHealth platform
  • Used natural language processing to extract sentiment and relevant features
  • Applied linear regression, logistic regression, and Random Forest models for analysis
  • Sentiment polarity significantly predicted patient satisfaction (β=0.351, p<0.001)
  • 29% of reviews included expressions of perceived symptom improvement
  • TF-IDF and Random Forest models displayed high classification performance (F1-scores 0.945 and 0.953 respectively)

Abstract

Background Subjective symptom monitoring is central to patient-centered care but often relies on burdensome surveys prone to recall bias. Mobile health (mHealth) platforms increasingly collect user-generated reviews that may provide real-time insights into patient experiences. However, it remains unclear whether such unsolicited narratives can serve as valid indicators of perceived health outcomes, particularly in non-Anglophone contexts. Objective This study examines whether linguistic features from Chinese-language mHealth reviews can be used to identify signals related to patient satisfaction and perceived symptom improvement. Methods An observational study was conducted using 6,362 publicly available user-generated reviews from the WeDoctor mHealth platform. A natural language processing pipeline extracted sentiment polarity, a keyword-derived perceived improvement indicator, and TF-IDF features. Sentiment was analyzed using linear regression to predict satisfaction, while logistic regression and Random Forest models were used to identify reviews containing improvement-related expressions. Results Sentiment polarity significantly predicted satisfaction (β=0.351, p<0.001). Approximately 29% of reviews contained improvement-related expressions. The TF-IDF model achieved strong classification performance (F1-score = 0.945), with Random Forest showing slightly improved performance (F1-score = 0.953). Conclusion Patient narratives contain emotional and functional signals that support real-time, low-burden monitoring of satisfaction and perceived improvement, complementing traditional survey-based outcome measures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Asante et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b38a487c87a6a40d5b6https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076261452394
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper