PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Water quality assessment in communities of the Cotopaxi province, Ecuador

View Full Paper
RIRudys Cusme IntriagoAGAraceli Lagla GuishcashoEAErick Cruz Aguinda

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the safety and suitability of water for human consumption in rural communities of Cotopaxi, Ecuador.
  • Analyzed physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters using standardized methodologies.
  • Communities assessed include La Calera, Tomailoma, and Toahilin.
  • Water quality was classified using the Water Quality Index (WQI) by the National Sanitation Foundation.
  • La Calera met most water quality parameters but had fecal coliform levels exceeding limits.
  • Toahilin showed high arsenic content, posing health risks.
  • Tomailoma's parameters were at or below permitted limits, with WQI values of 47.22, 38.28, and 29.86 indicating 'Poor' quality.

Abstract

The research assessed water quality in three rural communities in the province of Cotopaxi: La Calera, Tomailoma, and Toahilin. The objective was to determine its suitability for human consumption according to the regulations of the Unified Text of Secondary Environmental Legislation (TULSMA). Physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters were analyzed using standardized methodologies (HACH, QUICK, and Standard Methods). The results showed that the community of La Calera met most of the parameters, with the exception of fecal coliform levels exceeding the regulatory limit. Toahilin, on the other hand, had high arsenic content, representing a health risk. In Tomailoma, the parameters remained at or below the permitted limits. The Water Quality Index (WQI), according to the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF), indicated WQI values of 47.22, 38.28, and 29.86 for the communities, respectively, resulting in a classification of "Poor." Concluding that, regardless of the fact that most parameters comply with regulations, biological contamination and the presence of arsenic significantly affect water quality, it is recommended to strengthen drinking water systems with adequate treatment and community monitoring to guarantee the sustainability of the water resource.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Intriago et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b38a487c87a6a40d70chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20177273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper