PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

Co-creating micro-scale nature-based designs in Tshwane, South Africa: balancing stakeholder interests in the design process

View Full Paper
TPTania Du PlessisKBKathy BergerMPMaya Pasgaard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and climate adaptation pressures have escalated the need for co-created nature-based design solutions to address infrastructure challenges in urban green spaces. Yet, how diverse, cross-sectoral stakeholder expectations are navigated in these processes remains underexplored. This study investigates the feasibility of integrating co-creation into conventional landscape design practices, highlighting the associated stakeholder interests. The study took place in a South African marginalized peri-urban community and employed a multi-method approach including site surveys, focus group discussions, informal conversations, and co-design workshops. Our findings suggest that co-creation involves ascertaining buy-in from all stakeholders through a shared vision, inspiring capacity strengthening and empowerment, valuing knowledge exchange and reciprocal learning, identifying champions and bridging agents, and building bonds and maintaining trust. In co-creation, the designer becomes a facilitator rather than a creator, who must manage an extended co-design process that becomes part of the overall output. The feasibility of this process depends on managing degrees of co-creation through time, balancing desired outcomes between stakeholders, and focusing on dedicated engagement. Despite challenges, co-creating micro-scale nature-based designs can be used as a method of contextual inquiry and show potential to foster social inclusivity, reciprocal learning, and sustainable urban green space transformation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Plessis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08e435451dd5ba805b67d9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34314-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reinforcing nature-based solutions through tools providing social-ecological-technological integration2022 · 51 citations
  2. 2Role of Landscape Designers in Promoting a Balanced Approach to Green Infrastructure2014 · 25 citations
  3. 3Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities2019 · 828 citations
  4. 4Anticipating experimentation as the ‘the new normal’ through urban living labs 2.0: lessons learnt by JPI Urban Europe2022 · 23 citations
  5. 5Contextmapping: experiences from practice2005 · 1,016 citations