PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Lanaguage Research0 citationsOpen Access

Syntactic Priming in Korean L2 Learners’ Production of English Causative Construction

DWDa Bhin WonJSJeong‐Ah Shin

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the influence of proficiency and lexical overlap on syntactic priming effects in English causative constructions among Korean learners.
  • Forty-four Korean EFL learners participated in picture-selection and sentence-production tasks.
  • Participants engaged in a pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a delayed post-test with experimental and control groups.
  • In the delayed post-test, groups were divided into same-verb and different-verb conditions to examine lexical repetition effects.
  • Lower-proficiency learners showed significant reductions in reaction times from pre- to post-tests (p < 0.05), indicating robust priming effects.
  • Accuracy results indicated a three-way interaction among lexical overlap, proficiency, and test time, with lower-proficiency learners benefitting more from lexical overlap.
  • Reaction times did not display a significant interaction, likely due to the complexity of sentence generation.

Abstract

This study investigated how Korean EFL learners’ proficiency and lexical overlap influenced syntactic priming effects in English causative constructions. Forty-four learners participated in picture-selection and sentence-production tasks across a pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a delayed post-test. The experimental group received priming exposure, whereas the control group did not. In the delayed post-test, participants were further divided into same-verb (have) and different-verb (get) conditions to examine lexical repetition effects. Results for the first research question showed that lower-proficiency learners demonstrated significant reductions in reaction times from pre- to post-tests, indicating robust priming effects in reaction times. Regarding the second research question, accuracy results revealed a significant three-way interaction among lexical overlap, proficiency, and test time: lexical overlap facilitated greater gains particularly for lower-proficiency learners, aligning with developmental accounts suggesting early-stage learners rely more on explicit memory and repeated lexical cues. However, reaction times did not show a comparable interaction, likely due to the cognitive complexity of sentence generation and limited cumulative exposure. Overall, the study highlights that repeated exposure and lexical overlap can support L2 syntactic development (Hartsuiker & Bernolet, 2017), especially for lower-proficiency learners.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Won et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095af37880e6d24efe0b30https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2026.62.1.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper